Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36752978›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Physical Demands of Tennis Across the Different Court Surfaces, Performance Levels and Sexes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Babette M Pluim, Marleen G T Jansen, Samuel Williamson, Cain Berry, Silvia Camporesi, Kristina Fagher, Neil Heron, Dina C Janse van Rensburg, Víctor Moreno-Pérez, Andrew Murray and 9 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Babette M PluimSection Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. b.pluim@knltb.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-8980
Marleen G T JansenToptennis Department, Royal Netherlands Lawn Tennis Association (KNLTB), Amstelveen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8441-7748
Samuel WilliamsonEnglish Institute of Sport, London, UK.
Cain BerryLawn Tennis Association, London, UK.
Silvia CamporesiDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-1723
Kristina FagherRehabilitation Medicine Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-7553
Neil HeronCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-9806
Dina C Janse van RensburgSection Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1058-6992
Víctor Moreno-PérezCenter for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, San Joan, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-0045
Andrew MurraySport and Exercise, University of Edinburgh. Pleasance, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3327-8028
Seán R O'ConnorSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6805-8899
Fábio C L de OliveiraResearch Unit in Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-6560
Machar ReidTennis Australia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7196-3731
Miriam van ReijenToptennis Department, Royal Netherlands Lawn Tennis Association (KNLTB), Amstelveen, The Netherlands.
Tobias SaueressigPhysio Meets Science GmbH, Leimen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-3856
Linda J SchoonmadeUniversity Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2407-5977
Jane S ThorntonReturn to Health and Performance Lab, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-7101
Nick WebbornIPC Medical Committee, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3636-5557
Clare L ArdernDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-3631

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTennis is a multidirectional high-intensity intermittent sport for male and female individuals played across multiple surfaces. Although several studies have attempted to characterise the physical demands of tennis, a meta-analysis is still lacking.

objectiveWe aimed to describe and synthesise the physical demands of tennis across the different court surfaces, performance levels and sexes.

methodsPubMed, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to 19 April, 2022. A backward citation search was conducted for included articles using Scopus. The PECOS framework was used to formulate eligibility criteria. POPULATION: tennis players of regional, national or international playing levels (juniors and adults). EXPOSURE: singles match play. Comparison: sex (male/female), court surface (hard, clay, grass). OUTCOME: duration of play, on-court movement and stroke performance. STUDY

designcross-sectional, longitudinal. Pooled means or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A random-effects meta-analysis with robust variance estimation was performed. The measures of heterogeneity were Cochrane Q and 95% prediction intervals. Subgroup analysis was used for different court surfaces.

resultsThe literature search generated 7736 references; 64 articles were included for qualitative and 42 for quantitative review. Mean [95% confidence interval] rally duration, strokes per rally and effective playing time on all surfaces were 5.5 s [4.9, 6.3], 4.1 [3.4, 5.0] and 18.6% [15.8, 21.7] for international male players and 6.4 s [5.4, 7.6], 3.9 [2.4, 6.2] and 20% [17.3, 23.3] for international female players. Mean running distances per point, set and match were 9.6 m [7.6, 12.2], 607 m [443, 832] and 2292 m [1767, 2973] (best-of-5) for international male players and 8.2 m [4.4, 15.2], 574 m [373, 883] and 1249 m [767, 2035] for international female players. Mean first- and second-serve speeds were 182 km·h

conclusionsThe findings from this study provide a comprehensive summary of the physical demands of tennis. These results may guide tennis-specific training programmes. We recommend more consistent measuring and reporting of data to enable future meta-analysts to pool meaningful data. CLINICAL

trial registrationThe protocol for this systematic review was registered a priori at the Open Science Framework (Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MDWFY ).

Indexed as

TennisAdultCompetitive BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.