Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36752950›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2023

Fragility Score: a REMS-based indicator for the prediction of incident fragility fractures at 5 years.

Paola Pisani, Francesco Conversano, Maurizio Muratore, Giovanni Adami, Maria Luisa Brandi, Carla Caffarelli, Ernesto Casciaro, Marco Di Paola, Roberto Franchini, Davide Gatti and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Demographic determinants of REMS-derived BMD and fragility score.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Editorial: Is REMS-BMD Truly a Measured Parameter? A Call for Transparency and Technical Clarification.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paola PisaniInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Francesco ConversanoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Maurizio MuratoreASL-LE, Ospedale Vito Fazzi, Lecce, Italy.
Giovanni Adami *Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona, Italy.
Maria Luisa Brandi *Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation (FIRMO), Florence, Italy.
Carla Caffarelli *Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy.
Ernesto Casciaro *Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Marco Di Paola *Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Roberto Franchini *Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Davide Gatti *Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona, Italy.
Stefano Gonnelli *Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy.
Giuseppe Guglielmi *Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Foggia University School of Medicine, Foggia, Italy.
Fiorella Anna Lombardi *Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Alessandra Natale *R&D Department, Echolight Spa, Lecce, Italy.
Valentina Testini *Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Foggia University School of Medicine, Foggia, Italy.
Sergio CasciaroInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy. sergio.casciaro@cnr.it.
National Research Council · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Verona · ITOspedale Vito Fazzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate estimation of the imminent fragility fracture risk currently represents a challenging task. The novel Fragility Score (FS) parameter, obtained during a Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) scan of lumbar or femoral regions, has been developed for the non-ionizing estimation of skeletal fragility.

aimsThe aim of this study was to assess the performance of FS in the early identification of patients at risk for incident fragility fractures with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) measurements.

methodsData from 1989 Caucasians of both genders were analysed and the incidence of fractures was assessed during a follow-up period up to 5 years. The diagnostic performance of FS to discriminate between patients with and without incident fragility fracture in comparison to that of the BMD T-scores measured by both Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and REMS was assessed through ROC analysis.

resultsConcerning the prediction of generic osteoporotic fractures, FS provided AUC = 0.811 for women and AUC = 0.780 for men, which resulted in AUC = 0.715 and AUC = 0.758, respectively, when adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI). For the prediction of hip fractures, the corresponding values were AUC = 0.780 for women and AUC = 0.809 for men, which became AUC = 0.735 and AUC = 0.758, respectively, after age- and BMI-adjustment. Overall, FS showed the highest prediction ability for any considered fracture type in both genders, resulting always being significantly higher than either T-scores, whose AUC values were in the range 0.472-0.709.

conclusionFS displayed a superior performance in fracture prediction, representing a valuable diagnostic tool to accurately detect a short-term fracture risk.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporotic FracturesAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleSpectrum AnalysisFragility ScoreIncident fragility fractureOsteoporosisRadiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry, REMS

Identifiers

PMID36752950
PMCPMC10115670
OpenAlexW4319460866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.