ArticleEJNMMI research2023
The potential application of MR-derived ADCmin values from
Article in EJNMMI research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Emerging innovations in theranostics for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-Current Status and Advances in Diagnostic Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Head-to-Head Comparison between FDG andDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the utility of
methodsA retrospective study using
resultsHigher PNET grading was associated with higher FSUVmax, MTV, and TLG values (P < 0.05). TLG, SRD, ADCmin, and ADCmean values were correlated with N staging, while SRD, MTV, ADCmin, TLG, and ADCmean were associated with M staging. Notably, ADCmin was a negative correlation between FSUVmax (r = - 0.52; P < 0.001), MTV (r = - 0.50; P < 0.001), and TLG (r = - 0.56; P < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study highlights significant correlative relationships between FDG PET-derived parameters and ADCmin. ADCmin may offer utility as a tool for PNET staging and grading in lieu of FDG PET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.