ReviewJournal of molecular evolution2023
Embracing Complexity: Yeast Evolution Experiments Featuring Standing Genetic Variation.
Review in Journal of molecular evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strength of selection potentiates distinct adaptive responses in an evolution experiment with outcrossing yeast.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Evolutionary responses to increased opportunity for sexual selection in yeast.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Wild Patagonian yeast improve the evolutionary potential of novel interspecific hybrid strains for lager brewing.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Best Practices in Microbial Experimental Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a long and esteemed history as a model system for laboratory selection experiments. The majority of yeast evolution experiments begin with an isogenic ancestor, impose selection as cells divide asexually, and track mutations that arise and accumulate over time. Within the last decade, the popularity of S. cerevisiae as a model system for exploring the evolution of standing genetic variation has grown considerably. As a facultatively sexual microbe, it is possible to initiate experiments with populations that harbor diversity and also to maintain that diversity by promoting sexual recombination as the experiment progresses. These experimental choices expand the scope of evolutionary hypotheses that can be tested with yeast. And, in this review, I argue that yeast is one of the best model systems for testing such hypotheses relevant to eukaryotic species. Here, I compile a list of yeast evolution experiments that involve standing genetic variation, initially and/or by implementing protocols that induce sexual recombination in evolving populations. I also provide an overview of experimental methods required to set up such an experiment and discuss the unique challenges that arise in this type of research. Throughout the article, I emphasize the best practices emerging from this small but growing niche of the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.