Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36752780›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer therapeutics2023

Targeting Senescence as a Therapeutic Opportunity for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Bruno de Paula, Rosalind Kieran, Samantha Shui Yuan Koh, Susanne Crocamo, Eliana Abdelhay, Daniel Muñoz-Espín

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Leveraging PARP-1/2 to Target Distant Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno de PaulaBreast Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6427-229X
Rosalind KieranEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1789-9855
Samantha Shui Yuan KohDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0656-2448
Susanne CrocamoBreast Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5463-5517
Eliana AbdelhayInstituto Nacional de Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5166-0832
Daniel Muñoz-EspínEarly Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0550-9514
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA · BR

Funding

Cancer Research UK 26989Cancer Research UK 29760Cancer Research UK C62187/A26989Cancer Research UK C62187/A29760Medical Research Council MR/R000530/1NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL120206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with an elevated risk of recurrence and poor prognosis. Historically, only chemotherapy was available as systemic treatment, but immunotherapy and targeted therapies currently offer prolonged benefits. TNBC is a group of diseases with heterogeneous treatment sensitivity, and resistance is inevitable and early for a large proportion of the intrinsic subtypes. Although senescence induction by anticancer therapy offers an immediate favorable clinical outcome once the rate of tumor progression reduces, these cells are commonly dysfunctional and metabolically active, culminating in treatment-resistant repopulation associated with worse prognosis. This heterogeneous response can also occur without therapeutic pressure in response to damage or oncogenic stress, playing a relevant role in the carcinogenesis. Remarkably, there is preclinical and exploratory clinical evidence to support a relevant role of senescence in treatment resistance. Therefore, targeting senescent cells has been a scientific effort in many malignant tumors using a variety of targets and strategies, including increasing proapoptotic and decreasing antiapoptotic stimuli. Despite promising results, there are some challenges to applying this technology, including the best schedule of combination, assessment of senescence, specific vulnerabilities, and the best clinical scenarios. This review provides an overview of senescence in TNBC with a focus on future-proofing senotherapy strategies.

Indexed as

Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36752780
PMCPMC10157365
OpenAlexW4319461892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.