ArticleThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Neurodevelopment in the Congenital Heart Disease Population as Framed by the Life Course Health Development Framework.
Article in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ensuring Optimal Outcomes for Preterm Infants after NICU Discharge: A Life Course Health Development Approach to High-Risk Infant Follow-Up.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Contingent Mother's Voice Intervention Targeting Feeding in Hospitalized Infants with Critical Congenital Heart Defects.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdverse neurodevelopment is a common comorbidity associated with congenital heart disease (CHD). The consequences of adverse neurodevelopment are seen across the life course. The cause of adverse neurodevelopment is multifactorial, and use of a life course perspective can assist with understanding and enhancing neurodevelopment in individuals with CHD. PURPOSE: The purposes of this article are to (1) apply the Life Course Health Development framework to neurodevelopment in the population with CHD and (2) discuss how exposure to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) environment during infancy is a point of intervention for improving neurodevelopmental outcomes.
conclusionIndividuals with CHD are at an increased risk for adverse neurodevelopment across the life course. The PCICU environment is a point of intervention for improving neurodevelopmental outcomes. Stress can lead to changes in brain structure and function that are associated with negative outcomes in terms of outward behavioral and functional capacity, and the PCICU environment is a source of stressful stimuli. Infancy is a period of rapid brain growth, and the brain is more susceptible to stress during this period of the life course, putting infants receiving care in the PCICU at an increased risk of adverse neurodevelopment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Interventions to support optimal neurodevelopment should focus on the PCICU environment during infancy. Developmentally supportive care models should be explored as a means of modifying the PCICU environment. In addition, more research is needed on the relationship between the PCICU and neurodevelopment. The conceptual model introduced can serve as a starting point for this research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.