Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36752649›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

Healthcare utilization is a collider: an introduction to collider bias in EHR data reuse.

Nicole G Weiskopf, David A Dorr, Christie Jackson, Harold P Lehmann, Caroline A Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole G WeiskopfDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-909X
David A DorrDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2318-7261
Christie JacksonDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Harold P LehmannDivision of Health Science Informatics, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Caroline A ThompsonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Identifying and understanding drivers of selection bias and information bias in clinical COVID-19 dataR21LM013645 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WEISKOPF, NICOLE GRAY · 2021 to 2022
$368k
NLM NIH HHS R21 LM013645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCollider bias is a common threat to internal validity in clinical research but is rarely mentioned in informatics education or literature. Conditioning on a collider, which is a variable that is the shared causal descendant of an exposure and outcome, may result in spurious associations between the exposure and outcome. Our objective is to introduce readers to collider bias and its corollaries in the retrospective analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data. TARGET AUDIENCE: Collider bias is likely to arise in the reuse of EHR data, due to data-generating mechanisms and the nature of healthcare access and utilization in the United States. Therefore, this tutorial is aimed at informaticians and other EHR data consumers without a background in epidemiological methods or causal inference. SCOPE: We focus specifically on problems that may arise from conditioning on forms of healthcare utilization, a common collider that is an implicit selection criterion when one reuses EHR data. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are introduced as a tool for identifying potential sources of bias during study design and planning. References for additional resources on causal inference and DAG construction are provided.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareBiasConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicEpidemiologic MethodsRetrospective Studiescohort selectioncollider biasdirected acyclic graphsEHR data reusereal-world data

Identifiers

PMID36752649
PMCPMC10114115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.