ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023
Increased paired stimuli enhance corticospinal-motoneuronal plasticity in humans with spinal cord injury.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combinatorial approaches increasing neuronal activity accelerate recovery after spinal cord injury.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Multisite Hebbian Plasticity Restores Function in Humans with Spinal Cord Injury.Annals of neurology · 2023Trial
- A Distal-Proximal Gradient of Hebbian Plasticity in the Human Arm.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Combining cortical and spinal stimulation maximizes the improvement of gait after spinal cord injury.iScience · 2025Article
- Differences in Hebbian stimulation effects between biceps and triceps brachii in humans.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effects of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation Combined With Functional Electrical Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Upper Extremity Fine Motor Function.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: Current Status and Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells as a therapeutic strategy to combat oxidative stress-mediated neuropathic pain.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Review
- Hebbian priming of human motor learning.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Effects of noninvasive neuromodulation targeting the spinal cord on early learning of force control by the digits.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- A bi-cortical neuroprosthesis to modulate locomotion after incomplete spinal cord injury.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Paired corticospinal-motoneuronal stimulation (PCMS) has been used to enhance corticospinal excitability and functional outcomes in humans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Here, we examined the effect of increasing the number of paired pulses on PCMS-induced plasticity. During PCMS, corticospinal volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand motor cortex were timed to arrive at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle 1-2 ms before the arrival of antidromic potentials elicited in motoneurons by electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve. We tested motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by TMS over the hand motor cortex and electrical stimulation at the cervicomedullary junction (CMEPs) in the FDI muscle before and after 180 paired pulses (PCMS-180) followed up by another 180 paired pulses (PCMS-360) in humans with and without chronic incomplete cervical SCI. The nine-hole-peg-test (9HPT) was measured before and after PCMS paired pulses in individuals with SCI. We found that the size of MEPs and CMEPs increased after PCMS-180 in both groups compared with baseline and further increased after PCMS-360 in participants with SCI, suggesting a spinal origin for these effects. Notably, in people with SCI, the time to complete the 9HPT decreased after PCMS-180 and further decreased after PCMS-360 compared with baseline but not when the 9HPT was repeated overtime. Our findings demonstrate that increasing the number of PCMS paired pulses potentiates corticospinal excitability and voluntary motor output after SCI, likely through spinal plasticity. This proof-of-principle study suggests that increasing the PCMS dose represents a strategy to boost voluntary motor output after SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.