Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36752447›Full record

SynthesisJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2023

Prognostic Value of RV Abnormalities on CMR in Patients With Known or Suspected Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Jie Wang, Jinquan Zhang, Nisha Hosadurg, Yoshitaka Iwanaga, Yuxin Chen, Wei Liu, Ke Wan, Amit R Patel, Eleanor C Wicks, Georgios V Gkoutos and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Right ventricular dysfunction: an overlooked predictor of sudden cardiac death and arrhythmic events-a meta-analysis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Redefining Cardiac Sarcoidosis with Advanced Imaging and Therapeutic Strategies.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Jie WangCardiology Division, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jinquan ZhangWest China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Nisha HosadurgDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Yoshitaka IwanagaDepartment of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Yuxin ChenWest China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wei LiuWest China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ke WanDepartment of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Amit R PatelDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Eleanor C WicksOxford University Hospitals, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Georgios V GkoutosCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England; Health Data Research UK, Midlands Site, United Kingdom.
Yuchi HanCardiovascular Division, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Yucheng ChenCardiology Division, Department of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Center of Rare Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Electronic address: Chenyucheng2003@126.com.
Sichuan University · CNUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Virginia Health System · USNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JP

Funding

Training in Cardiovascular Imaging ResearchT32EB003841 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Jonathan R Lindner · 2004 to 2026
$4.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB003841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft ventricular abnormalities in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are associated with adverse cardiovascular events, whereas the prognostic value of right ventricular (RV) involvement found on cardiac magnetic resonance is unclear.

objectivesThis study aimed to systematically assess the prognostic value of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and RV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in known or suspected CS.

methodsThis study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022302579). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify studies that evaluated the association between RVEF or RV LGE on clinical outcomes in CS. A composite endpoint of all-cause death, cardiovascular events, or sudden cardiac death (SCD) was used. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled risk ratio (RR) for these adverse events. The calculated sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve with 95% CIs were weighted and summarized.

resultsEight studies including a total of 899 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 3.2 ± 0.7 years were included. The pooled RR of RV systolic dysfunction was 3.1 (95% CI: 1.7-5.5; P < 0.01) for composite events and 3.0 (95% CI: 1.3-7.0; P < 0.01) for SCD events. In addition, CS patients with RV LGE had a significant risk for composite events (RR: 4.8 [95% CI: 2.4-9.6]; P < 0.01) and a higher risk for SCD (RR: 9.5 [95% CI: 4.4-20.5]; P < 0.01) than patients without RV LGE. Furthermore, the pooled area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of RV LGE for identifying patients with CS who were at highest SCD risk were 0.8 (95% CI: 0.8-0.9), 69% (95% CI: 50%-84%), and 90% (95% CI: 70%-97%), respectively.

conclusionsIn patients with known or suspected CS, RVEF and RV LGE were both associated with adverse events. Furthermore, RV LGE shows good discrimination in identifying CS patients at high risk of SCD.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesHeart Defects, CongenitalMyocarditisSarcoidosisContrast MediaDeath, Sudden, CardiacGadoliniumHumansMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk FactorsStroke VolumeVentricular Function, RightContrast MediaGadoliniumcardiac magnetic resonancecardiac sarcoidosislate gadolinium enhancementright ventriclesudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID36752447
PMCPMC11229671
OpenAlexW4315631406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.