Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36752174›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2023

Evaluation of antibacterial effects of different intracanal medicaments on Enterococcus faecalis in primary teeth: An in vitro study.

Bushra Munzer Shamma, Saleh Al Kurdi, Anas Rajab, Ettihad Abo Arrag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Effectiveness of Aqueous Propolis Extract in Reducing theInternational journal of dentistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Strategies and mechanisms targetingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bushra Munzer ShammaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental College, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.ORCID 0000-0002-0176-5860
Saleh Al KurdiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental College, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.ORCID 0000-0001-7658-5437
Anas RajabDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Syrian Private University, Daraa, Syria.ORCID 0000-0002-3043-3566
Ettihad Abo ArragDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental College, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.ORCID 0000-0001-8848-5185
Damascus University · SYSyrian Private University · SY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSuccessful endodontic therapy is based on the reduction of infecting bacteria by cleaning, shaping, and disinfecting of the root canal system, thus the use of intracanal dressing is necessary for optimal success of root canal treatment. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of chitosan and propolis as intracanal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis compared to calcium hydroxide in primary root canals. MATERIAL AND

methodsNinety-six extracted primary second molars were collected. Teeth preparation was completed to size 30 K-file. They were randomly divided into four groups; (A): chitosan, (B): propolis, (C): calcium hydroxide, and (D): control group (saline). The tooth specimens were inoculated with E. faecalis. Then, tested materials were applied for all groups in accordance to the groups each tooth belonged to. Following this, the bacterial colonies were counted after 24 h, 72 h, and 1 week of applying dressing materials and incubation. Finally, one-way analysis of variance and Fisher's least significant difference tests were used for statistical comparisons between the groups at a significance level of .05.

resultsNo statistically significant difference was found between groups A, B, and C for both 24 h and a week (p ≥ .05). Yet, a statistical difference between groups A, B, C, and D after 72 h and 1 week were seen (p ≤ .05).

conclusionsChitosan and propolis medicaments were as effective as calcium hydroxide against E. faecalis in primary root canal treatment and might be considered as an alternative dressing material between treatment sessions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChitosanPropolisRoot Canal TherapyCalcium HydroxideEnterococcus faecalisHumansTooth, DeciduousAnti-Bacterial AgentsCalcium HydroxideChitosanPropoliscalcium hydroxidechitosanEnterococcus faecalispropolis

Identifiers

PMID36752174
PMCPMC10098284
OpenAlexW4319461664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.