Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36752058›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2024

Determining Prior Authorization Approval for Lumbar Stenosis Surgery With Machine Learning.

Amaury De Barros, Frederik Abel, Serhii Kolisnyk, Gaspere C Geraci, Fred Hill, Mary Engrav, Sundara Samavedi, Olga Suldina, Jack Kim, Andrej Rusakov and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amaury De BarrosToulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier-INSERM, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-8616
Frederik AbelHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8988-6917
Serhii KolisnykVinnitsa National Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-9424-0037
Gaspere C GeraciRemedy Logic, New York, NY, USA.
Fred HillRemedy Logic, New York, NY, USA.
Mary EngravRemedy Logic, New York, NY, USA.
Sundara SamavediRemedy Logic, New York, NY, USA.
Olga SuldinaCadabra Studio, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Jack KimRemedy Logic, New York, NY, USA.
Andrej RusakovRemedy Logic, New York, NY, USA.
Darren R LeblHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Raphael MouradRemedy Logic, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6700-5728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designMedical vignettes.

objectivesLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative condition with a high prevalence in the elderly population, that is associated with a significant economic burden and often requires spinal surgery. Prior authorization of surgical candidates is required before patients can be covered by a health plan and must be approved by medical directors (MDs), which is often subjective and clinician specific. In this study, we hypothesized that the prediction accuracy of machine learning (ML) methods regarding surgical candidates is comparable to that of a panel of MDs.

methodsBased on patient demographic factors, previous therapeutic history, symptoms and physical examinations and imaging findings, we propose an ML which computes the probability of spinal surgical recommendations for LSS. The model implements a random forest model trained from medical vignette data reviewed by MDs. Sets of 400 and 100 medical vignettes reviewed by MDs were used for training and testing.

resultsThe predictive accuracy of the machine learning model was with a root mean square error (RMSE) between model predictions and ground truth of .1123, while the average RMSE between individual MD's recommendations and ground truth was .2661. For binary classification, the AUROC and Cohen's kappa were .959 and .801, while the corresponding average metrics based on individual MD's recommendations were .844 and .564, respectively.

conclusionsOur results suggest that ML can be used to automate prior authorization approval of surgery for LSS with performance comparable to a panel of MDs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceLumbar spinal stenosismachine learningspinal surgerysurgical decision making

Identifiers

PMID36752058
PMCPMC11268295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.