Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36751931›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2023

Cells as the first data scientists.

Michael L Wong, Anirudh Prabhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the roles of function and selection in evolving systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. A robust, agnostic molecular biosignature based on machine learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael L WongEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8212-3036
Anirudh PrabhuEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9921-6084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concepts that we generally associate with the field of data science are strikingly descriptive of the way that life, in general, processes information about its environment. The 'information life cycle', which enumerates the stages of information treatment in data science endeavours, also captures the steps of data collection and handling in biological systems. Similarly, the 'data-information-knowledge ecosystem', developed to illuminate the role of informatics in translating raw data into knowledge, can be a framework for understanding how information is constantly being transferred between life and the environment. By placing the principles of data science in a broader biological context, we see the activities of data scientists as the latest development in life's ongoing journey to better understand and predict its environment. Finally, we propose that informatics frameworks can be used to understand the similarities and differences between abiotic complex evolving systems and life.

Indexed as

CellsData Sciencedata sciencedefinitions of lifeevolutioninformaticsinformation

Identifiers

PMID36751931
PMCPMC9905997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.