Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36751777›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2023

The role of monocytes in optic nerve injury.

Xiangxiang Liu, Yuan Liu, Mohamed M Khodeiry, Richard K Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiangxiang LiuBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Yuan LiuBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Mohamed M KhodeiryBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Richard K LeeBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CNUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monocytes, including monocyte-derived macrophages and resident microglia, mediate many phases of optic nerve injury pathogenesis. Resident microglia respond first, followed by infiltrating macrophages which regulate neuronal inflammation, cell proliferation and differentiation, scar formation and tissue remodeling following optic nerve injury. However, microglia and macrophages have distinct functions which can be either beneficial or detrimental to the optic nerve depending on the spatial context and temporal sequence of their activity. These divergent effects are attributed to pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines expressed by monocytes, crosstalk between monocyte and glial cells and even microglia-macrophage communication. In this review, we describe the dynamics and functions of microglia and macrophages in neuronal inflammation and regeneration following optic nerve injury, and their possible role as therapeutic targets for axonal regeneration.

Indexed as

fibrotic scarglial scarinflammationmacrophagemicrogliaoptic nerve injuryregeneration

Identifiers

PMID36751777
PMCPMC10154473
OpenAlexW4311498305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.