Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36751711›Full record

ArticleFlorence Nightingale journal of nursing2023

Nurses' Perception and Satisfaction Toward Electronic Medical Record System.

Vimala Ramoo, Athiah Kamaruddin, Wan Nor Fatihah Wan Nawawi, Chong Chin Che, Rasaiah Kavitha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Florence Nightingale journal of nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vimala RamooDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Athiah KamaruddinDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Wan Nor Fatihah Wan NawawiDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Chong Chin CheDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rasaiah KavithaDepartment of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aims to assess the perception and satisfaction of nurses toward the electronic medical record system in a teaching hospital.

methodA cross-sectional study was conducted among 350 nurses in a teaching hospital via a self-administered questionnaire between May to October 2019. Descriptive analysis, independent t-test, analysis of variance, and hierarchical multiple regression were used to analyze the data using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software version 25. In addition, a The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) was used as guide in reporting the results of this study.

resultsAlmost all the nurses (98%, n = 343) had a positive perception toward the electronic medical record system, though their perceptions significantly differ across work units, computer or laptop ownership, and daily time spent on the system (all p < .05). Nurses who had received training reported better satisfaction with the system.

conclusionAmong the issues highlighted by the participants that warrant attention were system development and connectivity. This study, therefore, emphasizes the involvement of nursing personnel in system development to ensure an appropriate approach for nursing care delivery.

Identifiers

PMID36751711
PMCPMC10081040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.