Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36751643›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2023

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and stringent social distancing measures on health-related quality of life and COVID-19 infection rates in patients with rheumatic disease: a longitudinal analysis through the pandemic.

Natasha Cox, Sabrina R Raizada, Nick Barkham, Srinivasan Venkatachalam, Tom P Sheeran, Tochukwu Adizie, Hem Sapkota, Ian C Scott, Sara Muller, James Bateman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04542031 (COVID-19 Prevalence in a Single Large UK Rheumatology Centre and the Impact on Quality of Life From Stringent Social Distancing), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04542031 nacompletednot on this map

COVID-19 Prevalence in a Single Large UK Rheumatology Centre and the Impact on Quality of Life From Stringent Social Distancing

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS TrustRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,010ConditionsCovid19, Rheumatic DiseasesArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natasha CoxPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
Sabrina R RaizadaThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7911-2819
Nick BarkhamThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Srinivasan VenkatachalamThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Tom P SheeranThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Tochukwu AdizieThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Hem SapkotaThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2314-2637
Ian C ScottPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.
Sara MullerPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-5751
James BatemanThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-2821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and stringent social isolation measures on patients with rheumatic disease (RD) from the beginning of the pandemic (April 2020). Methods: In this UK-based single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study, all RD follow-up patients at our centre were invited by SMS text message in April 2020 to participate in the study. Participants completed questionnaires at four time points between April 2020 and December 2021. We collected demographics, clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) status, short form 12 mental (MCS) and physical health component scores (PCS) for health-related quality of life, vaccination status, COVID-19 infection rates and incidence of long COVID. Results: We enrolled 1605 patients (female, 69.0%; CEV, 46.5%); 906 of 1605 (56.4%) completed linked responses to our final questionnaire. MCS improved (+0.6, Conclusions: Mental and physical health in RD patients has changed throughout the pandemic; outcomes for both metrics of health were worse in CEV patients, although there were no differences in infection rates between the groups. These data might assist the understanding and planning of future health-care policy and social restrictions in RD patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04542031.

Indexed as

health policyhealth-related quality of lifepatient outcomesrheumatic diseaseSMS communicationsstringent social isolation

Identifiers

PMID36751643
PMCPMC9897299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.