Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36751544›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2021

Current practices in diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Poland.

Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz, Piotr Brzyski, Urszula Jedynak-Wąsowicz, Marita Nittner-Marszalska, Immunotherapy Section of Polish Society of Allergology Working Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa Cichocka-JaroszDepartment of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Brzyski"Dziupla" Statistical Analysis Piotr Brzyski, Krakow, Poland.
Urszula Jedynak-WąsowiczDepartment of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Marita Nittner-MarszalskaDepartment of Internal Disease and Allergology, Medical University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.
Immunotherapy Section of Polish Society of Allergology Working Group
Jagiellonian University · PLUniversity of Wrocław · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) is associated with a high risk of anaphylaxis. Effective treatment of HVA patients requires allergologists' familiarity with the latest HVA recommendations. Aim: Evaluation of current practices in HVA diagnosis in Poland. Material and methods: A survey questionnaire was conducted in 32 HVA centres in Poland. Results: The response rate was 97%. There were 1829 patients evaluated due to HVA in 2015. Sixty six percent ( Conclusions: Most allergology centres in Poland follow HVA guidelines. We identified two inaccuracies in their HVA management including non-adequate venom concentration in IDT and a false belief in correspondence between sIgE concentration and severity of allergic reactions.

Indexed as

adherencediagnosticsguidelinesvenom allergy

Identifiers

PMID36751544
PMCPMC9880773
OpenAlexW3164492229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.