ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2021
Comparing the efficacy and safety of IL-17 inhibitors for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a randomized double blind pilot study with a review of literature.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Nanotechnology advances for psoriasis treatment and future prospects.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular and Kidney Outcomes After Systemic Treatment for Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Biologics for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Review
- The role of fibroblast-neutrophil crosstalk in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases: a multi-tissue perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Psoriasis: Immunological and genetic blueprints driving pathogenesis and potential for personalized therapies.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Review
- Prevalence of fungal colonization among patients with psoriasis in difficult-to-treat areas: impact of apremilast on mycotic burden and clinical outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Short-, Mid-, and Long-Term Efficacy of Deucravacitinib Versus Biologics and Nonbiologics for Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis.Dermatology and therapy · 2023Article
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- An Analysis ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease in which interleukin-17A (IL-17A) has been found to play an important role. Commercially available anti-IL-17 drugs include brodalumab, ixekizumab (IXE), and secukinumab (SEC). Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of IXE and SEC in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Material and methods: The patients were randomized to the IXE or SEC group. Effectiveness was estimated by Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Safety was assessed by documentation of adverse effects (AEs), routine laboratory values, and injection-site and allergic reactions. Results: There were 155 patients in the IXE group and 158 in the SEC group. At week 12, PASI 75 was 76.77% (IXE) vs. 67.09% (SEC); PASI 90 42.58% (IXE) vs. 32.28% (SEC); PGA score of 0 or 1 at week 40 (79.52% vs. 74.4%) and at week 52 (61.83% vs. 58.12%) ( Conclusions: Although both groups demonstrated a robust clinical response, a significant improvement in patient quality of life, and a satisfactory safety profile, the IXE group scored a notch higher.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.