ArticleEngineering in life sciences2023
Employing QbD strategies to assess the impact of cell viability and density on the primary recovery of monoclonal antibodies.
Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capacitance Technology Enables Automated Feeding, Improved Expansion, and Higher Throughput of CAR-T Cell Stirred-Tank Bioreactor Cultures.Biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Powered Optimization of a CHO Cell Cultivation Process.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- Employing QbD strategies to assess the impact of cell viability and density on the primary recovery of monoclonal antibodies.Engineering in life sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality by Design (QbD) is one of the most important tools for the implementation of Process Analytical Technology (PAT) in biopharmaceutical production. For optimal characterization of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) upstream process a stepwise approach was implemented. The upstream was divided into three process stages, namely inoculum expansion, production, and primary recovery, which were investigated individually. This approach enables analysis of process parameters and associated intermediate quality attributes as well as systematic knowledge transfer to subsequent process steps. Following previous research, this study focuses on the primary recovery of the mAb and thereby marks the final step toward a holistic characterization of the upstream process. Based on gained knowledge during the production process evaluation, the cell viability and density were determined as critical parameters for the primary recovery. Directed cell viability adjustment was achieved using cytotoxic camptothecin in a novel protocol. Additionally, the cell separation method was added to the Design of Experiments (DoE) as a qualitative factor and varied between filtration and centrifugation. To assess the quality attributes after cell separation, the bioactivity of the mAb was analyzed using a cell-based assay and the purity of the supernatant was evaluated by measurement of process related impurities (host cell protein proportion, residual DNA). Multivariate data analysis of the compiled data confirmed the hypothesis that the upstream process has no significant influence on the bioactivity of the mAb. Therefore, process control must be tuned towards high mAb titers and purity after the primary recovery, enabling optimal downstream processing of the product. To minimize amounts of host cell proteins and residual DNA the cell viability should be maintained above 85% and the cell density should be controlled around 15 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.