Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36751431›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2023

Content and Engagement Among Plastic Surgeons on Instagram.

Kometh Thawanyarat, Chandler Hinson, Diego A Gomez, Mallory A Rowley, Yelissa Navarro, Chelsea M Venditto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Engagement of Plastic Surgery Content on TikTok and Instagram.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Instagram Versus Reality: Who Are Actually Plastic Surgeons?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Fantasies and Fallacies of 'Aesthetic' Instagrammers.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kometh ThawanyaratMedical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-8879
Chandler HinsonFrederick P. Whiddon College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-3047
Diego A GomezMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7818-3546
Mallory A RowleySUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0733-6880
Yelissa NavarroMedical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Chelsea M VendittoMedical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Augusta University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of South Alabama · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients routinely use social media to locate providers, review before-and-after photographs, and discuss experiences, making it a powerful marketing tool for plastic surgeons. A few studies have systematically evaluated plastic surgery app content. Objectives: This study aims to analyze engagement levels and content posted by top plastic surgeon influencers on Instagram (Menlo Park, CA). Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study in February 2022 to identify the top 10 global plastic surgeons on Instagram. Influencers were ranked based on the number of followers, and their latest 20 posts were analyzed. A total of 200 posts were categorized by 2 independent trainees as one of the following: marketing, education, personal, and miscellaneous. The number of likes was recorded as a proxy for engagement, and the average engagement for each category was calculated. Results: The top 10 influencers work primarily in private practice focusing on aesthetic procedures. Out of 200 categorized posts on Instagram, marketing posts had the greatest presence (64.5%), followed by personal (20%), miscellaneous (11%), and educational (4.5%). More still images were posted (56.5%) than videos (43.5%). The highest average engagement was for personal content ( Conclusions: Although most content posted related to marketing efforts, many influencers were also using social media to post about their personal lives and promote their ancillary businesses. Although marketing content was the most common, engagement levels were the highest for personal and educational content, and no significant differences in engagement were found between videos and photos.

Identifiers

PMID36751431
PMCPMC9898873
OpenAlexW4313477883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.