Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36751366›Full record

ReviewAoB PLANTS2023

Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival.

Ningyi Zhang, Xiaohan Zhou, Mengzhen Kang, Bao-Gang Hu, Ep Heuvelink, Leo F M Marcelis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AoB PLANTS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ningyi ZhangHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Xiaohan ZhouHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mengzhen KangChinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation, Sate Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems (CASIA-MCCS), Beijing 100190, China.
Bao-Gang HuChinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation, National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition (CASIA-NLPR), Beijing 100190, China.
Ep HeuvelinkHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Leo F M MarcelisHorticulture and Product Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8088-7232
Wageningen University & Research · NLChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid increases of the global population and climate change pose major challenges to a sustainable production of food to meet consumer demands. Process-based models (PBMs) have long been used in agricultural crop production for predicting yield and understanding the environmental regulation of plant physiological processes and its consequences for crop growth and development. In recent years, with the increasing use of sensor and communication technologies for data acquisition in agriculture, machine learning (ML) has become a popular tool in yield prediction (especially on a large scale) and phenotyping. Both PBMs and ML are frequently used in studies on major challenges in crop production and each has its own advantages and drawbacks. We propose to combine PBMs and ML given their intrinsic complementarity, to develop knowledge- and data-driven modelling (KDDM) with high prediction accuracy as well as good interpretability. Parallel, serial and modular structures are three main modes can be adopted to develop KDDM for agricultural applications. The KDDM approach helps to simplify model parameterization by making use of sensor data and improves the accuracy of yield prediction. Furthermore, the KDDM approach has great potential to expand the boundary of current crop models to allow upscaling towards a farm, regional or global level and downscaling to the gene-to-cell level. The KDDM approach is a promising way of combining simulation models in agriculture with the fast developments in data science while mechanisms of many genetic and physiological processes are still under investigation, especially at the nexus of increasing food production, mitigating climate change and achieving sustainability.

Indexed as

and databased modelsdriven modellingKnowledgeMachine learningProcessyield prediction

Identifiers

PMID36751366
PMCPMC9893870
OpenAlexW4311079602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.