ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2022
Quality of life after percutaneous paravalvular leak closure - a prospective registry.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitral Paravalvular Leak 3D Printing from 3D-Transesophageal Echocardiography.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- 3D printing from transesophageal echocardiography for planning mitral paravalvular leak closure - feasibility study.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Presence of paravalvular leaks (PVLs) can lead to heart failure, which decreases quality of life (QoL). Percutaneous closure is becoming the first-line treatment of PVLs, but whether such a procedure could improve QoL in these patients has never been examined. Aim: To examine changes in scores of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) after percutaneous PVL closure. Material and methods: Forty subjects with heart failure symptoms and at least moderate PVL were included in this prospective registry. QoL was assessed at baseline and during a 12-month follow-up after percutaneous PVL closure by MLHFQ and KCCQ questionnaires. Changes in NT-proBNP and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were also analyzed. Results: Technical success (TS) was achieved in 97.5% of cases and procedural success (PS) in 85% of cases. In the group with PS a significant decrease in MLHFQ score as well as an increase in scores of all KCCQ domains was observed. No statistically significant changes were observed in the group without PS, mainly due to the small sample size. Conclusions: Percutaneous PVL closure is associated with better QoL during a 12-month follow-up provided PS was achieved. Due to the low number of subjects in whom PS was not achieved, it is not possible to determine the influence of a failed procedure in this group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.