ReviewPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2022
Catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias during pregnancy.
Review in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Representation of Women in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Association of Maternal Cardiac Arrhythmias with Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for arrhythmias in pregnancy: validation of a standardized approach with 5-year follow-up.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of electrical cardioversion and catheter ablation during pregnancy: a case review and literature analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Brazilian Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Underrepresentation of Women in Trials of Atrial Fibrillation Ablations: Fact or Thinking?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Nonfluoroscopic catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardias during pregnancy using simplified electroanatomic marker annotation.HeartRhythm case reports · 2024Article
- Zero-Fluoroscopy Catheter Ablation of Right Appendage Focal Atrial Tachycardia in a Pregnant Woman.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Refractory arrhythmias during pregnancy pose challenges to physicians. Aim: To give an overview of catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias during pregnancy, and to discuss the indications of the procedure and the outcomes of both mother and fetus. Material and methods: The study materials were based on comprehensive literature retrieval of the pertinent articles published since 2000. Results: The indications for catheter ablation were refractory arrhythmias unresponsive to drug therapy in most of the cases followed by requirement of cardioversion. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was the most common arrhythmia developed during pregnancy. Pregnancy complications were present in 2.4% of the cases. There was no mortality among the pregnant patients. Fetal adverse events occurred in 3.1% of the cases, more in the fluoroscopy than in the zero-fluoroscopy group. The patient cohort with a radiation dose of > 50 mGy in one-third of the cases had a 14.3% fetal adverse event rate. Fetal adverse events occurred only in the second trimester, not in the other two trimesters. Conclusions: Drug-refractory and poorly tolerated tachycardias in pregnant patients warrant catheter ablation. Zero-fluoroscopy technique under guidance with three-dimensional mapping systems is preferred and strict minimal fluoroscopy is only used in extreme necessity. As ablation in the second trimester was associated with a probable higher fetal adverse event rate, it is suggested that ablation is preferably performed in the third trimester.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.