Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750995›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastric cancer2023

Endoscopic Resection of Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer.

Yuichiro Hirai, Seiichiro Abe, Mai Ego Makiguchi, Masau Sekiguchi, Satoru Nonaka, Haruhisa Suzuki, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, Yutaka Saito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastric cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuichiro HiraiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-1837
Seiichiro AbeEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. seabe@ncc.go.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-6921
Mai Ego MakiguchiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-0907
Masau SekiguchiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-6896
Satoru NonakaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0925-9137
Haruhisa SuzukiEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2284-0943
Shigetaka YoshinagaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2368-878X
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2296-8373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely performed for early gastric cancer (EGC) with a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in Eastern Asian countries. In particular, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) leads to a high en bloc resection rate, enabling accurate pathological evaluation. As undifferentiated EGC (UD-EGC) is known to result in a higher incidence of LNM and infiltrative growth than differentiated EGC (D-EGC), the indications for ER are limited compared with those for D-EGC. Previously, clinical staging as intramucosal UD-EGC ≤2 cm, without ulceration, was presented as 'weakly recommended' or 'expanded indications' for ER in the guidelines of the United States, Europe, Korea, and Japan. Based on promising long-term outcomes from a prospective multicenter study by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 1009/1010, the status of this indication has expanded and is now considered 'absolute indications' in the latest Japanese guidelines published in 2021. In this study, which comprised 275 patients with UD-EGC (cT1a, ≤2 cm, without ulceration) treated with ESD, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 99.3% (95% confidence interval, 97.1%-99.8%), which was higher than the threshold 5-year OS (89.9%). Currently, the levels of evidence grades and recommendations for ER of UD-EGC differ among Japan, Korea, and Western countries. Therefore, a further discussion is warranted to generalize the indications for ER of UD-EGC in countries besides Japan.

Indexed as

Endoscopic submucosal dissectionEndoscopyGastric cancerNeoplasmsStomach

Identifiers

PMID36750995
PMCPMC9911616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.