ReviewJournal of gastric cancer2023
Endoscopic Resection of Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer.
Review in Journal of gastric cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanded Indications in Advanced Endoscopic Resection of Malignant Gastrointestinal Lesions.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Discrepancies between preoperative assessment and final pathological criteria in early gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis of early gastric cancer: present practice and future prospects.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Influence factors of clinical effects on patients with early gastric cancer: A retrospective study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Management Strategy of Non-curative ESD in Gastric Cancer: Curative Criteria, and the Critical Building Block for Determining Beyond It.Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Review
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer Exceeding Expanded Criteria-Long-Term Outcomes from the German ESD Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A Modified eCura System to Stratify the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Undifferentiated-Type Early Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Resection.Journal of gastric cancer · 2024Article
- Delayed Perforation after Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Proceed to Prompt Intervention If Acceptable.Gut and liver · 2024Article
- Should All Undifferentiated Early Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Noncurative Endoscopic Resection Be Sent to the Operating Room?Gut and liver · 2023Article
- A Nomogram for Predicting Extraperigastric Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic resection (ER) is widely performed for early gastric cancer (EGC) with a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in Eastern Asian countries. In particular, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) leads to a high en bloc resection rate, enabling accurate pathological evaluation. As undifferentiated EGC (UD-EGC) is known to result in a higher incidence of LNM and infiltrative growth than differentiated EGC (D-EGC), the indications for ER are limited compared with those for D-EGC. Previously, clinical staging as intramucosal UD-EGC ≤2 cm, without ulceration, was presented as 'weakly recommended' or 'expanded indications' for ER in the guidelines of the United States, Europe, Korea, and Japan. Based on promising long-term outcomes from a prospective multicenter study by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 1009/1010, the status of this indication has expanded and is now considered 'absolute indications' in the latest Japanese guidelines published in 2021. In this study, which comprised 275 patients with UD-EGC (cT1a, ≤2 cm, without ulceration) treated with ESD, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 99.3% (95% confidence interval, 97.1%-99.8%), which was higher than the threshold 5-year OS (89.9%). Currently, the levels of evidence grades and recommendations for ER of UD-EGC differ among Japan, Korea, and Western countries. Therefore, a further discussion is warranted to generalize the indications for ER of UD-EGC in countries besides Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.