Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750944›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2023

Women's experiences with using domperidone as a galactagogue to increase breast milk supply: an australian cross-sectional survey.

Grace M McBride, Robyn Stevenson, Gabbie Zizzo, Alice R Rumbold, Lisa H Amir, Amy Keir, Luke E Grzeskowiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Grace M McBrideAdelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, Australia.
Robyn StevensonAdelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, Australia.
Gabbie ZizzoAdelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, Australia.
Alice R RumboldAdelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, Australia.
Lisa H AmirJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Amy KeirAdelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, Australia.
Luke E GrzeskowiakAdelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide , Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomperidone is one of the most commonly utilised pharmacological galactagogues, with evidence of increasing use in clinical practice. However, the use of domperidone as a galactagogue remains controversial, with mixed evidence on safety and efficacy, leading to variable clinical practice recommendations. We sought to evaluate contemporary patterns of domperidone use and examine maternal experiences related to perceived safety and effectiveness.

methodsIn 2019, we conducted an online, cross-sectional survey of Australian breastfeeding women to examine individual experiences related to domperidone use, in addition to perceptions of safety and effectiveness.

resultsAmong 1876 survey responses, 19% (n = 355) reported using domperidone. Domperidone use was significantly higher in women who were primiparous, gave birth preterm, delivered by caesarean section, had self-perceived low milk supply, and saw a lactation consultant. Nearly 20% of women commenced domperidone use in the first week postpartum (19%, n = 67). The median duration of use was six weeks (interquartile range 3-16 weeks). Maximum reported doses of domperidone used ranged from 20 mg/day to 160 mg/day. Half (n = 178, 50%) of women reported using a dose of 30 mg/day or less, 44% (n = 155) reported using a dose between 31 and 60 mg/day, and 6% (n = 22) reported using a dose greater than 61 mg/day. Nearly half of the respondents reported domperidone as 'very' or 'extremely effective' (45%, n = 161), with only 8% (n = 27) reporting it was 'not at all effective'. Almost half (n = 172, 48%) of all women using domperidone reported side effects, including weight gain (25%), headaches (17%) and dry mouth (13%). Higher doses were associated with an increased likelihood of any side effects (≤ 30 mg/day, 38%; >31-≤60 mg/day, 48%, > 61 mg/day 73%; P < 0.004), with 31 (9%) stopping domperidone because of side effects.

conclusionWe identified widespread variation in domperidone utilisation patterns, with domperidone broadly perceived to be effective in increasing breast milk supply. Side effects associated with domperidone treatment were common, appeared to be dose-related, and were frequently associated with treatment cessation. These findings highlight the importance of improved clinical practice recommendations and generation of evidence from additional high-quality clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of domperidone. More conclusive clinical trials are needed to determine the efficacy, as well as optimal dose and duration, of domperidone use.

Indexed as

DomperidoneGalactogoguesAustraliaBreast FeedingCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDopamine AntagonistsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLactationMilk, HumanPregnancyDomperidoneDopamine AntagonistsGalactogoguesBreastfeedingCross-sectional studiesDomperidoneGalactagoguesHuman milkLactationSurveys

Identifiers

PMID36750944
PMCPMC9903405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.