Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750932›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Deep learning approach to detection of colonoscopic information from unstructured reports.

Donghyeong Seong, Yoon Ho Choi, Soo-Yong Shin, Byoung-Kee Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the benefits and challenges of AI-driven large language models in gastroenterology: Think out of the box.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Donghyeong SeongSamsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Ho ChoiDepartment of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Yong ShinDepartment of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 06355, Republic of Korea.
Byoung-Kee YiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Kangwon National University, 1 Kangwondaehak-Gil, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, 24341, Republic of Korea. byoungkeeyi@gmail.com.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HI19C1328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths. Several screening tests, such as colonoscopy, can be used to find polyps or colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy reports are often written in unstructured narrative text. The information embedded in the reports can be used for various purposes, including colorectal cancer risk prediction, follow-up recommendation, and quality measurement. However, the availability and accessibility of unstructured text data are still insufficient despite the large amounts of accumulated data. We aimed to develop and apply deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) methods to detect colonoscopic information.

methodsThis study applied several deep learning-based NLP models to colonoscopy reports. Approximately 280,668 colonoscopy reports were extracted from the clinical data warehouse of Samsung Medical Center. For 5,000 reports, procedural information and colonoscopic findings were manually annotated with 17 labels. We compared the long short-term memory (LSTM) and BioBERT model to select the one with the best performance for colonoscopy reports, which was the bidirectional LSTM with conditional random fields. Then, we applied pre-trained word embedding using large unlabeled data (280,668 reports) to the selected model.

resultsThe NLP model with pre-trained word embedding performed better for most labels than the model with one-hot encoding. The F1 scores for colonoscopic findings were: 0.9564 for lesions, 0.9722 for locations, 0.9809 for shapes, 0.9720 for colors, 0.9862 for sizes, and 0.9717 for numbers.

conclusionsThis study applied deep learning-based clinical NLP models to extract meaningful information from colonoscopy reports. The method in this study achieved promising results that demonstrate it can be applied to various practical purposes.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningColonoscopyData WarehousingHumansNatural Language ProcessingColonoscopyData processingDeep learningInformation extractionNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID36750932
PMCPMC9903463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.