ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023
Deep learning approach to detection of colonoscopic information from unstructured reports.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictive Performance of Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Performance of Natural Language Processing for Information Extraction From Electronic Health Records Within Cancer: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Emerging applications of NLP and large language models in gastroenterology and hepatology: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Improving Postpolypectomy Surveillance Decisions Using an Automated Analysis of Colonoscopy and Histopathology Reports: 2-Center Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Enhancing and Not Replacing Clinical Expertise: Improving Named-Entity Recognition in Colonoscopy Reports Through Mixed Real-Synthetic Training Sources.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Large Language Model Applications for Health Information Extraction in Oncology: Scoping Review.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Exploring the benefits and challenges of AI-driven large language models in gastroenterology: Think out of the box.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths. Several screening tests, such as colonoscopy, can be used to find polyps or colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy reports are often written in unstructured narrative text. The information embedded in the reports can be used for various purposes, including colorectal cancer risk prediction, follow-up recommendation, and quality measurement. However, the availability and accessibility of unstructured text data are still insufficient despite the large amounts of accumulated data. We aimed to develop and apply deep learning-based natural language processing (NLP) methods to detect colonoscopic information.
methodsThis study applied several deep learning-based NLP models to colonoscopy reports. Approximately 280,668 colonoscopy reports were extracted from the clinical data warehouse of Samsung Medical Center. For 5,000 reports, procedural information and colonoscopic findings were manually annotated with 17 labels. We compared the long short-term memory (LSTM) and BioBERT model to select the one with the best performance for colonoscopy reports, which was the bidirectional LSTM with conditional random fields. Then, we applied pre-trained word embedding using large unlabeled data (280,668 reports) to the selected model.
resultsThe NLP model with pre-trained word embedding performed better for most labels than the model with one-hot encoding. The F1 scores for colonoscopic findings were: 0.9564 for lesions, 0.9722 for locations, 0.9809 for shapes, 0.9720 for colors, 0.9862 for sizes, and 0.9717 for numbers.
conclusionsThis study applied deep learning-based clinical NLP models to extract meaningful information from colonoscopy reports. The method in this study achieved promising results that demonstrate it can be applied to various practical purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.