Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750907›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2023

Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia.

Shaun T O'Keeffe, Paula Leslie, Tracy Lazenby-Paterson, Arlene McCurtin, Lindsey Collins, Aoife Murray, Alison Smith, Siofra Mulkerrin, SPARC (Swallow Perspectives, Advocacy and Research Collective)

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Ethical Challenges and Considerations in Dysphagia Management: A Scoping Review.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaun T O'KeeffeDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Newcastle Rd, Galway, Ireland. sokeeffeanc@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7682-5004
Paula LeslieNorthern Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Tracy Lazenby-PatersonNHS Lothian Community Learning Disability Service, Leith Community Treatment Centre, Edinburgh, UK.
Arlene McCurtinSchool of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Lindsey CollinsCentre for Applied Dementia StudiesFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Aoife MurraySchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Alison SmithPharmacy and Medicines Optimisation Team, Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
Siofra MulkerrinDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England, UK.
SPARC (Swallow Perspectives, Advocacy and Research Collective)
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBHemel Hempstead Hospital · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospital · GBNHS Lothian · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity Hospital Galway · IEUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of modified texture diets-thickening of liquids and modifying the texture of foods-in the hope of preventing aspiration, pneumonia and choking, has become central to the current management of dysphagia. The effectiveness of this intervention has been questioned. We examine requirements for a valid informed consent process for this approach and whether the need for informed consent for this treatment is always understood or applied by practitioners. MAIN TEXT: Valid informed consent requires provision of accurate and balanced information, and that agreement is given freely by someone who knows they have a choice. Current evidence, including surveys of practitioners and patients in different settings, suggests that practice in this area is often inadequate. This may be due to patients' communication difficulties but also poor communication-and no real attempt to obtain consent-by practitioners before people are 'put on' modified texture diets. Even where discussion occurs, recommendations may be influenced by professional misconceptions about the efficacy of this treatment, which in turn may poison the well for the informed consent process. Patients cannot make appropriate decisions for themselves if the information provided is flawed and unbalanced. The voluntariness of patients' decisions is also questionable if they are told 'you must', when 'you might consider' is more appropriate. Where the decision-making capacity of patients is in question, inappropriate judgements and recommendations may be made by substitute decision makers and courts unless based on accurate information.

conclusionResearch is required to examine the informed consent processes in different settings, but there is ample reason to suggest that current practice in this area is suboptimal. Staff need to reflect on their current practice regarding use of modified texture diets with an awareness of the current evidence and through the 'lens' of informed consent. Education is required for staff to clarify the importance of, and requirements for, valid informed consent and for decision making that reflects people's preferences and values.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersCommunicationDietHumansInformed ConsentDuty of careDysphagiaEthicsInformed consentModified texture dietQuality of lifeShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID36750907
PMCPMC9903443
OpenAlexW4319350519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.