Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750893›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Video-based assessment (VBA) of an open, simulated orthopedic surgical procedure: a pilot study using a single-angle camera to assess surgical skill and decision making.

Obaid Al-Hubaishi, Troy Hillier, Megan Gillis, William Oxner, Andrew Trenholm, Glen Richardson, Ross Leighton, Andrew Glennie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Video-Based Learning in Orthopedic Education: A Systematic Mapping Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Obaid Al-HubaishiDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Troy HillierFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Megan GillisDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
William OxnerDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Andrew TrenholmDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Glen RichardsonDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Ross LeightonDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Andrew GlennieDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. Andrew.glennie@nshealth.ca.
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideos have been used in many settings including medical simulation. Limited information currently exists on video-based assessment in surgical training. Effective assessment tools have substantial impact on the future of training. The objectives of this study were as follows: to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of video-based assessment of orthopedic surgery residents performing open cadaveric simulation procedures and to explore the benefits and limitations of video-based assessment.

methodsA multi-method technique was used. In the quantitative portion, four residents participated in a Surgical Objective Structured Clinical Examination in 2017 at a quaternary care training center. A single camera bird's-eye view was used to videotape the procedures. Five orthopedic surgeons evaluated the surgical videos using the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation. Interclass correlation coefficient was used to calculate inter-rater reliability. In the qualitative section, semi-structured interviews were used to explore the perceived strengths and limitations of video-based assessment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The scores using video-based assessment demonstrated good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.832, p = 0.014) in assessing open orthopedic procedures on cadavers. Qualitatively, the strengths of video-based assessment in this study are its ability to assess global performance and/or specific skills, ability to reassess missed points during live assessment, and potential use for less common procedures. It also allows for detailed constructive feedback, flexible assessment time, anonymous assessment, multiple assessors and serves as a good coaching tool. The main limitations of video-based assessment are poor audio-video quality, and questionable feasibility for assessing readiness for practice.

conclusionVideo-based assessment is a potential adjunct to live assessment in orthopedic open procedures with good inter-rater reliability. Improving audio-video quality will enhance the quality of the assessment and improve the effectiveness of using this tool in surgical training.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceDecision MakingHumansPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsCompetency-Based Medical EducationMedical educationOrthopedic surgeryVideo-based assessment

Identifiers

PMID36750893
PMCPMC9904250
OpenAlexW4319346407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.