Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750631›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Modeling acute care utilization: practical implications for insomnia patients.

Farid Chekani, Zitong Zhu, Rezaul Karim Khandker, Jizhou Ai, Weilin Meng, Emma Holler, Paul Dexter, Malaz Boustani, Zina Ben Miled

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Farid ChekaniMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Zitong ZhuComputer Science, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Rezaul Karim KhandkerMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Jizhou AiMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Weilin MengMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Emma HollerSchool of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Paul DexterSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Malaz BoustaniSchool of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Zina Ben MiledRegenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. zmiled@iupui.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning models can help improve health care services. However, they need to be practical to gain wide-adoption. In this study, we investigate the practical utility of different data modalities and cohort segmentation strategies when designing models for emergency department (ED) and inpatient hospital (IH) visits. The data modalities include socio-demographics, diagnosis and medications. Segmentation compares a cohort of insomnia patients to a cohort of general non-insomnia patients under varying age and disease severity criteria. Transfer testing between the two cohorts is introduced to demonstrate that an insomnia-specific model is not necessary when predicting future ED visits, but may have merit when predicting IH visits especially for patients with an insomnia diagnosis. The results also indicate that using both diagnosis and medications as a source of data does not generally improve model performance and may increase its overhead. Based on these findings, the proposed evaluation methodologies are recommended to ascertain the utility of disease-specific models in addition to the traditional intra-cohort testing.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMachine LearningCritical CareHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36750631
PMCPMC9905481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.