ArticleScientific reports2023
Identifying congenital generalized lipodystrophy using deep learning-DEEPLIPO.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Spectrum ofCells · 2023Pooled it
- Cavin gene family and caveolae-related disorders: pathogenetic roles and possible mechanisms.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Pathways to improving the awareness, diagnosis and management of lipodystrophy in Brazil: an expert panel discussion.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Calf skinfold measurements as a diagnostic tool for lipodystrophy syndromes: a cross-sectional study.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- The clinical approach to child and adolescent patients with lipodystrophy: a series of international case discussions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Siblings With Berardinelli-Seip Congenital Lipodystrophy: Clinical Insights and Challenges.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital Generalized Lipodystrophy (CGL) is a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by near complete absence of functional adipose tissue from birth. CGL diagnosis can be based on clinical data including acromegaloid features, acanthosis nigricans, reduction of total body fat, muscular hypertrophy, and protrusion of the umbilical scar. The identification and knowledge of CGL by the health care professionals is crucial once it is associated with severe and precocious cardiometabolic complications and poor outcome. Image processing by deep learning algorithms have been implemented in medicine and the application into routine clinical practice is feasible. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify congenital generalized lipodystrophy phenotype using deep learning. A deep learning approach model using convolutional neural network was presented as a detailed experiment with evaluation steps undertaken to test the effectiveness. These experiments were based on CGL patient's photography database. The dataset consists of two main categories (training and testing) and three subcategories containing photos of patients with CGL, individuals with malnutrition and eutrophic individuals with athletic build. A total of 337 images of individuals of different ages, children and adults were carefully chosen from internet open access database and photographic records of stored images of medical records of a reference center for inherited lipodystrophies. For validation, the dataset was partitioned into four parts, keeping the same proportion of the three subcategories in each part. The fourfold cross-validation technique was applied, using 75% (3 parts) of the data as training and 25% (1 part) as a test. Following the technique, four tests were performed, changing the parts that were used as training and testing until each part was used exactly once as validation data. As a result, a mean accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were obtained with values of [90.85 ± 2.20%], [90.63 ± 3.53%] and [91.41 ± 1.10%], respectively. In conclusion, this study presented for the first time a deep learning model able to identify congenital generalized lipodystrophy phenotype with excellent accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, possibly being a strategic tool for detecting this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.