Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750596›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Calibration of spectra in presence of non-stationary background using unsupervised physics-informed deep learning.

Alessandro Puleio, Riccardo Rossi, Pasqualino Gaudio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alessandro PuleioDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo RossiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. r.rossi@ing.uniroma2.it.
Pasqualino GaudioDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calibration is a key part of the development of a diagnostic. Standard approaches require the setting up of dedicated experiments under controlled conditions in order to find the calibration function that allows one to evaluate the desired information from the raw measurements. Sometimes, such controlled experiments are not possible to perform, and alternative approaches are required. Most of them aim at extracting information by looking at the theoretical expectations, requiring a lot of dedicated work and usually involving that the outputs are extremely dependent on some external factors, such as the scientist experience. This work presents a possible methodology to calibrate data or, more generally, to extract the information from the raw measurements by using a new unsupervised physics-informed deep learning methodology. The algorithm allows to automatically process the data and evaluate the searched information without the need for a supervised training by looking at the theoretical expectations. The method is examined in synthetic cases with increasing difficulties to test its potentialities, and it has been found that such an approach can also be used in very complex behaviours, where human-drive results may have huge uncertainties. Moreover, also an experimental test has been performed to validate its capabilities, but also highlight the limits of this method, which, of course, requires particular attention and a good knowledge of the analysed phenomena. The results are extremely interesting, and this methodology is believed to be applied to several cases where classic calibration and supervised approaches are not accessible.

Identifiers

PMID36750596
PMCPMC9905576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.