ArticleScientific reports2023
Calibration of spectra in presence of non-stationary background using unsupervised physics-informed deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsupervised spectra information extraction using physics-informed neural networks in the presence of non-linearities and multi-agent problems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artifacts and Anomalies in Raman Spectroscopy: A Review on Origins and Correction Procedures.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Physics-informed neural network with transfer learning (TL-PINN) based on domain similarity measure for prediction of nuclear reactor transients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calibration is a key part of the development of a diagnostic. Standard approaches require the setting up of dedicated experiments under controlled conditions in order to find the calibration function that allows one to evaluate the desired information from the raw measurements. Sometimes, such controlled experiments are not possible to perform, and alternative approaches are required. Most of them aim at extracting information by looking at the theoretical expectations, requiring a lot of dedicated work and usually involving that the outputs are extremely dependent on some external factors, such as the scientist experience. This work presents a possible methodology to calibrate data or, more generally, to extract the information from the raw measurements by using a new unsupervised physics-informed deep learning methodology. The algorithm allows to automatically process the data and evaluate the searched information without the need for a supervised training by looking at the theoretical expectations. The method is examined in synthetic cases with increasing difficulties to test its potentialities, and it has been found that such an approach can also be used in very complex behaviours, where human-drive results may have huge uncertainties. Moreover, also an experimental test has been performed to validate its capabilities, but also highlight the limits of this method, which, of course, requires particular attention and a good knowledge of the analysed phenomena. The results are extremely interesting, and this methodology is believed to be applied to several cases where classic calibration and supervised approaches are not accessible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.