ArticleScientific reports2023
A deep learning model for detection of leukocytes under various interference factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fuzzy logic and deep learning approach for automated white blood cell detection and classification via multi-CNN feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A two stage blood cell detection and classification algorithm based on improved YOLOv7 and EfficientNetv2.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving the generalizability of white blood cell classification with few-shot domain adaptation.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- A large multi-focus dataset for white blood cell classification.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Enhancing parasitic organism detection in microscopy images through deep learning and fine-tuned optimizer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A high-resolution large-scale dataset of pathological and normal white blood cells.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnostic Cytology and Genomic Testing for Hematologic Disorders.Cells · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate detection of leukocytes is the basis for the diagnosis of blood system diseases. However, diagnosing leukocyte disorders by doctors is time-consuming and requires extensive experience. Automated detection methods with high accuracy can improve detection efficiency and provide recommendations to inexperienced doctors. Current methods and instruments either fail to automate the identification process fully or have low performance and need suitable leukocyte data sets for further study. To improve the current status, we need to develop more intelligent strategies. This paper investigates fulfilling high-performance automatic detection for leukocytes using a deep learning-based method. We established a new dataset more suitable for leukocyte detection, containing 6273 images (8595 leukocytes) and considering nine common clinical interference factors. Based on the dataset, the performance evaluation of six mainstream detection models is carried out, and a more robust ensemble model is proposed. The mean of average precision (mAP) @IoU = 0.50:0.95 and mean of average recall (mAR)@IoU = 0.50:0.95 of the ensemble model on the test set are 0.853 and 0.922, respectively. The detection performance of poor-quality images is robust. For the first time, it is found that the ensemble model yields an accuracy of 98.84% for detecting incomplete leukocytes. In addition, we also compared the test results of different models and found multiple identical false detections of the models, then provided correct suggestions for the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.