Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750590›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A deep learning model for detection of leukocytes under various interference factors.

Meiyu Li, Cong Lin, Peng Ge, Lei Li, Shuang Song, Hanshan Zhang, Lu Lu, Xiaoxiang Liu, Fang Zheng, Shijie Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meiyu Li *Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Cong Lin *School of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Zhuhai, China.
Peng GeTianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Lei LiClinical Laboratory, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shuang SongTianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Hanshan ZhangThe Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Lu LuInstitute of Disaster Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoxiang LiuSchool of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Zhuhai, China.
Fang ZhengSchool of Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Shijie ZhangDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. shijie.zhang@tmu.edu.cn.
Xuguo SunSchool of Medical Laboratory, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. sunxuguo@tmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate detection of leukocytes is the basis for the diagnosis of blood system diseases. However, diagnosing leukocyte disorders by doctors is time-consuming and requires extensive experience. Automated detection methods with high accuracy can improve detection efficiency and provide recommendations to inexperienced doctors. Current methods and instruments either fail to automate the identification process fully or have low performance and need suitable leukocyte data sets for further study. To improve the current status, we need to develop more intelligent strategies. This paper investigates fulfilling high-performance automatic detection for leukocytes using a deep learning-based method. We established a new dataset more suitable for leukocyte detection, containing 6273 images (8595 leukocytes) and considering nine common clinical interference factors. Based on the dataset, the performance evaluation of six mainstream detection models is carried out, and a more robust ensemble model is proposed. The mean of average precision (mAP) @IoU = 0.50:0.95 and mean of average recall (mAR)@IoU = 0.50:0.95 of the ensemble model on the test set are 0.853 and 0.922, respectively. The detection performance of poor-quality images is robust. For the first time, it is found that the ensemble model yields an accuracy of 98.84% for detecting incomplete leukocytes. In addition, we also compared the test results of different models and found multiple identical false detections of the models, then provided correct suggestions for the clinic.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerLeukocytes

Identifiers

PMID36750590
PMCPMC9905612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.