Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750494›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023

Visual and quantitative assessment of hip implant-related metal artifacts at low field MRI: a phantom study comparing a 0.55-T system with 1.5-T and 3-T systems.

Hanns-Christian Breit, Jan Vosshenrich, Martin Clauss, Thomas J Weikert, Bram Stieltjes, Balázs K Kovacs, Michael Bach, Dorothee Harder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of MR-Induced Heating Effects in Four Common Veterinary Implants at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A Phantom Study.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intraoral Coil Arrays for Single-Tooth Dental MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinical MR imaging of patients with spinal hardware at 0.55T: comparison of diagnostic assessment and metal artifact appearance with 1.5T.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanns-Christian BreitDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Jan VosshenrichDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. jan.vosshenrich@usb.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-8472
Martin ClaussDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, |University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas J WeikertDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Bram StieltjesDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Balázs K KovacsDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael BachDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Dorothee HarderDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate hip implant-related metal artifacts on a 0.55-T system compared with 1.5-T and 3-T systems.

methodsTotal hip arthroplasty made of three different alloys were evaluated in a water phantom at 0.55, 1.5, and 3 T using routine protocols. Visually assessment (VA) was performed by three readers using a Likert scale from 0 (no artifacts) to 6 (extremely severe artifacts). Quantitative assessment (QA) was performed using the coefficient of variation (CoV) and the fraction of voxels within a threshold of the mean signal intensity compared to an automatically defined region of interest (FVwT). Agreement was evaluated using intra/inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsInterreader agreement of VA was strong-to-moderate (ICC 0.74-0.82). At all field strengths (0.55-T/1.5-T/3-T), artifacts were assigned a lower score for titanium (Ti) alloys (2.44/2.9/2.7) than for stainless steel (Fe-Cr) (4.1/3.9/5.1) and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys (4.1/4.1/5.2) (p < 0.001 for both). Artifacts were lower for 0.55-T and 1.5-T than for 3-T systems, for all implants (p ≤ 0.049). A strong VA-to-QA correlation was found (r = 0.81; p < 0.001); CoV was lower for Ti alloys than for Fe-Cr and Co-Cr alloys at all field strengths. The FVwT showed a negative correlation with VA (-0.68 < r < -0.84; p < 0.001).

conclusionsArtifact intensity was lowest for Ti alloys at 0.55 T. For other alloys, it was similar at 0.55 T and 1.5 T, higher at 3 T. Despite an inferior gradient system and a larger bore width, the 0.55-T system showed the same artifact intensity of the 1.5-T system.

Indexed as

AlloysMetalsMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstheses and ImplantsTitaniumAlloysMetalsTitaniumArtifactsHip prosthesisImage processing (computer-assisted)Magnetic resonance imagingTitanium

Identifiers

PMID36750494
PMCPMC9905379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.