Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36750178›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2023

A spontaneous gravity prior: newborn chicks prefer stimuli that move against gravity.

Larry Bliss, Vera Vasas, Laura Freeland, Robyn Roach, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Elisabetta Versace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What is Balance? A Vital Mechano-Regulation Paradigm.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perception of animate motion in dogs.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Larry BlissDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Vera VasasDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Laura FreelandDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Robyn RoachDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.
Elisa Raffaella FerrèDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK.
Elisabetta VersaceDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-1851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the beginning of life, inexperienced animals use evolutionary-given preferences (predispositions) to decide what stimuli to attend and approach. Stimuli that contain cues of animacy, such as face-like stimuli, biological motion and changes in speed, are particularly attractive across vertebrate taxa. A strong cue of animacy is upward movement against terrestrial gravity, because only animate objects consistently move upward. To test whether upward movement is spontaneously considered attractive already at birth, we tested the early preferences of dark-hatched chicks (

Indexed as

ChickensMotion PerceptionAnimalsBiological EvolutionCuesMovementanimacychicksgravityprecocial speciespredispositionsupward movement

Identifiers

PMID36750178
PMCPMC9904944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.