ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2023
A Holistic Approach To Oncofertility In A Patient With Rectal Cancer: A Case Report.
Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCryopreservation techniques are used to preserve fertility before cancer treatment with gonadotoxic agents. Herein, we report a case of fertility preservation involving a 29-year-old G0P0 woman, married for one year, who was referred to our hospital for fertility preservation before starting rectal cancer treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: Ovarian tissue and embryo cryopreservation were performed. Before the procedure, ovarian reserve was evaluated, and antral follicle counts were determined. Laparoscopic ovarian tissue cryopreservation was performed from the left side with a lower antral follicle count. Thus, we were able to keep the number of oocytes obtained in the following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle at the highest level. Subsequently, the right ovary was transposed into the lateral wall of the abdomen under the peritoneum. Conventionally controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was initiated on the first postoperative day, depending on the menstrual cycle phase. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed on four mature oocytes obtained, and one embryo was cryopreserved. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was initiated on the first postoperative day, and the process was repeated on the seventh postoperative day, yielding a total of seven viable embryos for cryopreservation.
conclusionsThere is usually only one chance of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in patients requiring a fertility-sparing approach due to malignancy. In the combined technique, performing ovarian tissue resection from the ovary with a lower number of antral follicles can keep the number of oocytes at the highest level in the following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.