Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36749760›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

Impact of coaching on physician wellness: A systematic review.

Sylvain Boet, Cole Etherington, Pierre-Marc Dion, Chloé Desjardins, Manvinder Kaur, Valentina Ly, Manon Denis-LeBlanc, Cecile Andreas, Abi Sriharan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07053111 (The Counselor Led Resident Wellness Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07053111 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Counselor Led Resident Wellness Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nevada, RenoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled21ConditionsBurnout, Healthcare Workers, Anxiety, Wellness Program, Depression Not Otherwise SpecifiedArmsWellness Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How to Be Coachable.AEM education and training · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Committed to Success: A Structured Mentoring Program for Clinically Oriented Physicians.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sylvain BoetDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyperbaric Medicine Unit, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1679-818X
Cole EtheringtonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hyperbaric Medicine Unit, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Pierre-Marc DionClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5584-3844
Chloé DesjardinsFrancophone Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5726-8970
Manvinder KaurClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Valentina LyHealth Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Manon Denis-LeBlancInstitut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Canada.
Cecile AndreasProfessional and Continuing Studies, Royal Roads University, Victoria, Canada.
Abi SriharanInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physician wellness is critical for patient safety and quality of care. Coaching has been successfully and widely applied across many industries to enhance well-being but has only recently been considered for physicians. This review aimed to summarize the existing evidence on the effect of coaching by trained coaches on physician well-being, distress and burnout. MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched without language restrictions to December 21, 2022. Studies of any design were included if they involved physicians of any specialty undergoing coaching by trained coaches and assessed at least one measure along the wellness continuum. Pairs of independent reviewers determined reference eligibility. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and for Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures as well as inconsistent reporting. The search retrieved 2531 references, of which 14 were included (5 RCTs, 2 non-randomized controlled studies, 4 before-and-after studies, 2 mixed-methods studies, 1 qualitative study). There were 1099 participants across all included studies. Risk of bias was moderate or serious for non-RCTs, while the 5 RCTs were of lower risk. All quantitative studies reported effectiveness of coaching for at least one outcome assessed. The included qualitative study reported a perceived positive impact of coaching by participants. Evidence from available RCTs suggests coaching for physicians can improve well-being and reduce distress/burnout. Non-randomized interventional studies have similar findings but face many limitations. Consistent reporting and standardized outcome measures are needed.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalMentoringPhysiciansBurnout, PsychologicalHumansOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID36749760
PMCPMC9904500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.