Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36749581›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Assessment of Scotopic Function in Rod-Cone Inherited Retinal Degeneration With the Scotopic Macular Integrity Assessment.

Jasleen K Jolly, Anika Nanda, Thomas M W Buckley, Maximilian Pfau, Holly Bridge, Robert E MacLaren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Assessment ofBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  6. Exploring Scotopic Microperimetry as an Outcome Measure in Choroideremia.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jasleen K JollyNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anika NandaNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Thomas M W BuckleyOxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Maximilian PfauDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Holly BridgeOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Robert E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBNational Institutes of Health · USOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health CA-CDRF-2016-02-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The scotopic macular integrity assessment (S-MAIA) can perform scotopic assessment to detect localized changes to scotopic rod and cone function. This study is an exploratory investigation of the feasibility of using the S-MAIA in a rod-cone dystrophy population to identify the pattern of loss in scotopic photoreceptor function. Methods: Twenty patients diagnosed with a rod-cone dystrophy underwent visual acuity testing, full-field stimulus threshold assessment, and multiple S-MAIA tests after dark adaptation periods of 20 minutes and 45 minutes performed separately. Only right eyes were tested. Three tests were performed following a learning test. A Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess repeatability and agreement between tests after the two time periods. Spatial interpolation maps were created from the group plots to display the pattern of rod and cone loss. Results: Learning effects took place between testing sessions 1 and 2 but not 2 and 3. Limits of agreement were larger in the patient eyes than control eyes, but within previously reported values. Using longer adaptation time of 45 minutes did not offer a significant advantage over 20 minutes. Patterns for the cyan and red sensitivities were different, indicating different patterns of loss for rods and cones. Conclusions: A dark adaptation time of 20 minutes before testing is sufficient for thresholding. The S-MAIA is suitable for use in patients with a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vision of at least 0.7 and provides a viable outcome measure for patients with rod-cone dystrophies and preserved central vision. The spatial information about scotopic function from the S-MAIA provides information about disease processes and progression. Translational Relevance: There is a need for scotopic measures for use in clinical trials. Scotopic microperimetry works well in patients with early disease, allowing the extension of recruitment criteria for novel therapies of rod-cone dystrophies.

Indexed as

Cone-Rod DystrophiesRetinal DegenerationDark AdaptationHumansPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID36749581
PMCPMC9919682
OpenAlexW4319334196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.