Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36749465›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2023

Coping with COVID in corrections: a qualitative study among the recently incarcerated on infection control and the acceptability of wastewater-based surveillance.

Lindsey R Riback, Peter Dickson, Keyanna Ralph, Lindsay B Saber, Rachel Devine, Lindsay A Pett, Alyssa J Clausen, Jacob A Pluznik, Chava J Bowden, Jennifer C Sarrett and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lindsey R RibackAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. lindsey.riback@einsteinmed.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8805-270X
Peter DicksonRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Keyanna RalphRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lindsay B SaberRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rachel DevineRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lindsay A PettRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alyssa J ClausenRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jacob A PluznikRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Chava J BowdenRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jennifer C SarrettCenter for the Study of Human Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Alysse G WurcelTufts Medical Center, MA, Boston, USA.
Victoria L PhillipsRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anne C SpauldingRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Matthew J AkiyamaAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

Emory College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University Emory College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrectional settings are hotspots for SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Social and biological risk factors contribute to higher rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among justice-involved individuals. Rapidly identifying new cases in congregate settings is essential to promote proper isolation and quarantine. We sought perspectives of individuals incarcerated during COVID-19 on how to improve carceral infection control and their perspectives on acceptability of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) accompanying individual testing.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 adults who self-reported being incarcerated throughout the United States between March 2020 and May 2021. We asked participants about facility enforcement of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 guidelines, and acceptability of integrating WBS into SARS-CoV-2 monitoring strategies at their most recent facility. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the study sample and report on acceptability of WBS. We analyzed qualitative data thematically using an iterative process.

resultsParticipants were predominantly Black or multiple races (50%) and men (75%); 46 years old on average. Most received a mask during their most recent incarceration (90%), although only 40% received counseling on proper mask wearing. A quarter of participants were tested for SARS-CoV-2 at intake. Most (70%) believed they were exposed to the virus while incarcerated. Reoccurring themes included (1) Correctional facility environment leading to a sense of insecurity, (2) Perceptions that punitive conditions in correctional settings were exacerbated by the pandemic; (3) Importance of peers as a source of information about mitigation measures; (4) Perceptions that the safety of correctional environments differed from that of the community during the pandemic; and (5) WBS as a logical strategy, with most (68%) believing WBS would work in the last correctional facility they were in, and 79% preferred monitoring SARS-CoV-2 levels through WBS rather than relying on just individual testing.

conclusionParticipants supported routine WBS to monitor for SARS-CoV-2. Integrating WBS into existing surveillance strategies at correctional facilities may minimize the impact of future COVID-19 outbreaks while conserving already constrained resources. To enhance the perception and reality that correctional systems are maximizing mitigation, future measures might include focusing on closer adherence to CDC recommendations and clarity about disease pathogenesis with residents.

Indexed as

COVID-19IncarceratedJailJustice-involved individualsPandemicPrisonSARS-CoV-2SurveillanceWastewater

Identifiers

PMID36749465
PMCPMC9903258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.