ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2023
Dose-dependent efficacy of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy and adverse events of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in the treatment of glioma: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Low-Dose Antiangiogenic Therapy With Different Chemotherapy Backbones Among Patients With Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancer innovation · 2026Article
- Role of Bevacizumab in Multiple Glioblastomas: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2026Article
- Sevoflurane is associated with reduced EGFR-VEGF-AKT signaling in glioma tissues relative to propofol: a bioinformatics and clinical pilot study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: does dose matter? Our monocentric and comparative experience.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Canadian Expert Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Glioblastoma: Results of a Delphi Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Breaking Down Glioma-Microenvironment Crosstalk.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025Review
- Review
- Bevacizumab exerts dose-dependent risk for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with malignant gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- The efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy followed by bevacizumab and temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a case report.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Emotional distress impairs immune checkpoint blockade efficacy in recurrent high-grade glioma: Insights from tumor in situ fluid analysis.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Defying the Odds in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Complete Response following Salvage Therapy with Bevacizumab and Irinotecan - A Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
- The influence of VEGFR-2 blockade and focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening on the glioma-immune landscape.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBevacizumab (BEV), at a standard dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks is associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) but no improvement in overall survival (OS) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Few studies have examined the potential dose-dependent efficacy of BEV. In Ontario, reimbursement for the costs of BEV varies, and as a result, our practice began to routinely use lower dose regimens. The main aim of this study was to ensure that there was no harm to patients who received the low dose protocol.
methodsA single-center retrospective study of patients given BEV for rGBM between 2015 and 2020 was performed. Clinical and treatment data including BEV dose regimen [SD (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) vs. LD (5 mg/kg every 2-3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks)] received at the time of rGBM diagnosis were captured. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) on BEV were compared using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Log-rank test was used to compare potential predictive factors. Cox regression model was performed for multivariable analysis of OS and PFS.
resultsA total of 96 patients were included with a median follow-up duration of 6.84 months (range 1.12-50.63 months) from the date of the first infusion. The LD group consisted of 55 of the 96 patients. By virtue of funding mechanisms for BEV, the median age in the LD group was significantly higher (62 vs. 54 years p = 0.009). There was no difference in MGMT status between the two groups (p = 0.60). The LD group had prolonged median PFS (5.89 months versus 3.22 months; p = 0.0112) and OS (10.23 months versus 6.28 months; p = 0.0010). Multivariable analysis including the dose of BEV, the extent of resection, gender, and age revealed that standard dose of BEV, subtotal resection, and female sex were associated with worse overall survival. Nine patients in the SD group vs. 18 patients in the LD group reported an adverse event related to BEV.
conclusionFor patients with recurrent GBM, we found that a low dose regimen of BEV was associated with prolonged OS and PFS compared to the standard dose regimen. Lower dose schedules may be a better and more cost-effective option for patients with rGBM. Lower costs might provide more equitable access to this very important palliative drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36749445What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.