Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36749354›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2023

The abuse potential of lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, according to the 8 factors of the Controlled Substances Act.

Margaret Moline, Shoji Asakura, Carsten Beuckman, Ishani Landry, Beatrice Setnik, Judy Ashworth, Jack E Henningfield

Open access · hybridFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Margaret MolineEisai Inc., 200 Metro Boulevard, Nutley, Jersey, NJ, 07110, USA. Margaret_Moline@eisai.com.
Shoji AsakuraEisai Co., Ltd., Tsukuba, Japan.
Carsten BeuckmanFormerly Eisai Co., Ltd., Tsukuba, Japan.
Ishani LandryFormerly Eisai, Nutley, Jersey, NJ, USA.
Beatrice SetnikAltasciences, Laval, Quebec, Canada and the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Judy AshworthPinney Associates, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jack E HenningfieldPinney Associates, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eisai (Japan) · JPEisai (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USPinney Associates (United States)University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleLemborexant (LEM) is a dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA) approved in multiple countries including the USA, Japan, Canada, Australia, and several Asian countries for the treatment of insomnia in adults. As a compound with central nervous system activity, it is important to understand the abuse potential of LEM with respect to public health.

objectivesThis review discusses data for LEM relevant to each of the 8 factors of the United States Controlled Substances Act.

resultsLEM did not demonstrate abuse potential in nonclinical testing and was associated with a low incidence of abuse-related adverse events in clinical study participants with insomnia disorder. Similar to other DORAs that have been evaluated (eg., almorexant, suvorexant (SUV), and daridorexant), LEM and the positive controls (zolpidem and SUV) also showed drug liking in a phase 1 abuse potential study that enrolled subjects who used sedatives recreationally. However, internet surveillance of SUV and the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System suggests that drugs in the DORA class display very low abuse-related risks in the community. Additionally, as described in FDA-approved labeling, it does not carry physical dependence and withdrawal risks.

conclusionsLEM, similar to most other prescription insomnia medications, was placed into Schedule IV. However, LEM and other drugs in the DORA class may have a lower potential for abuse as suggested by real-world postmarketing data from federal surveys and internet surveillance, and thus may have lower risks to public health than Schedule IV benzodiazepines and nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics that potentiate GABA signaling.

Indexed as

Orexin Receptor AntagonistsSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAdultControlled SubstancesHumansHypnotics and SedativesPyridinesPyrimidinesControlled SubstancesHypnotics and SedativeslemborexantOrexin Receptor AntagonistsPyridinesPyrimidinesAbuse potentialControlled Substances ActDependence potentialDrug abuseDual orexin receptor antagonistHumanHypnoticsLemborexantMonkeyRat

Identifiers

PMID36749354
PMCPMC10006052
OpenAlexW4319333915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read104
identifiers read17
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.