Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36749181›Full record

SynthesisTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2023

Retention in care for type 2 diabetes management in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.

Anupam Garrib, Tsi Njim, Olukemi Adeyemi, Faith Moyo, Natalie Halloran, Huanyuan Luo, Duolao Wang, Joseph Okebe, Katie Bates, Victor Santana Santos and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anupam GarribDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-3749
Tsi NjimDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Olukemi AdeyemiDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Faith MoyoDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Natalie HalloranDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Huanyuan LuoDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Duolao WangDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Joseph OkebeDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Katie BatesDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Victor Santana SantosDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto, Brazil.
Kaushik RamaiyaShree Hindu Mandal Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Shabbar JaffarUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF M 3069Department of Health 16/137/87
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiabetes prevalence has risen rapidly in Sub-Saharan Africa, but rates of retention in diabetes care are poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine rates of retention in care of persons with type 2 diabetes.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Global Health and CINAHL online databases for cohort studies and randomised control trials (RCTs) published up to 12 October 2021, that reported retention in or attrition from care for patients with type 2 diabetes in Sub-Saharan Africa. Retention was defined as persons diagnosed with diabetes who were alive and in care or with a known outcome, while attrition was defined as loss from care.

resultsFrom 6559 articles identified, after title and abstract screening, 209 articles underwent full text review. Forty six papers met the inclusion criteria, comprising 22,610 participants. Twenty one articles were of RCTs of which 8 trials had 1 year or more of follow-up and 25 articles were of non-randomised studies of which 19 had 12 months or more of follow-up. A total of 11 studies (5 RCTs and 6 non-randomised) were assessed to be of good quality. Sixteen RCTs were done in secondary or tertiary care settings. Their pooled retention rate (95% CI) was 80% (77%, 84%) in the control arm. Four RCTs had been done in primary care settings and their pooled retention rate (95% CI) was 53% (45%, 62%) in the control arm. The setting of one trial was unclear. For non-randomised studies, retention rates (95% CI) were 68% (62%, 75%) among 19 studies done in secondary and tertiary care settings, and 40% (33%, 49%) among the 6 studies done in primary care settings.

conclusionRates of retention in care of people living with diabetes are poor in primary care research settings.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Retention in CareAfrica South of the SaharaCohort StudiesHumansattritionretention in careretention ratesSub-Saharan Africasystematic reviewtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID36749181
PMCPMC10947597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.