ReviewUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2023
Correlation of important prognostic factors and CT scores in invasive and non-invasive ventilation of COVID-19 patients.
Review in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Searching for New Biomarkers to Assess COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study.Metabolites · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive care workers received the largest share of the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused nightmares to the whole world. In COVID-19 pneumonia cases which had high mortality rates, many prognostic factors and laboratory examinations were tried to evaluate the clinical severity quickly and accurately.This study was planned to investigate a correlation between the initially ventilation strategy and major prognostic parameters and CT scores in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsIn our study, we reviewed 50 consecutive non-invasive mv and 50 consecutive invasive mv treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia patients between March 23, 2020,and May 23, 2020, in the ICUs of our hospital. Patients who were divided into twogroups (non-invasive mechanical ventilation [NIMV] and invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV]) as an initial ventilation strategy according to clinical severity and P/F ratios were evaluated comparatively; demographic data, admission and lowest P/F ratios, admission and highest SOFA scores, comorbidity status, scores on CT at diagnosis, length of ICU stays, hospitalization periods, and mortality rates were examined.
resultsAbout 85% of all patients were 46 years and older. No significant difference was found in terms of gender and comorbidity status. The lowest P/F ratio was significantly lower in IMV group. The admission and highest SOFA values were higher in the IMV group. There was no significant difference between the CT scores and the number of lobes involved. The mortality rate in the IMV group was significantly higher.
conclusionPatients who started treatment with NIMV had relatively low poor prognostic factors, their mortality was lower. However, the total CT score at diagnosis was expected to be higher in those who were performed IMV, no significant difference was found in our study. We concluded that the severity classification of the patients cannot be made according to CT scores. CT results should be evaluated as a whole according to the patient's clinic, predisposing factors, and response to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.