Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36748659›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Do young adults with cancer receive information about treatment-related impact on sex life? Results from a population-based study.

Charlotta Bergström, Claudia Lampic, Ricky Roy, Christel Hedman, Johan Ahlgren, Olof Ståhl, Karin E Smedby, Kristina Hellman, Roger Henriksson, Lars E Eriksson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Appraisal of sexual functioning before and after cancer: insights from adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors and matched healthy controls.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sexuality, intimacy, and body image among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a qualitative, explorative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotta BergströmDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-7279
Claudia LampicDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ricky RoyDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christel HedmanDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4183-7598
Johan AhlgrenDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Olof StåhlDepartment of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Karin E SmedbyDepartment of Medicine Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristina HellmanDepartment of Gynecologic Cancer, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Roger HenrikssonDepartment of Radiation Science and Oncology, University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Lars E ErikssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Lena WettergrenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEUppsala University · SEDanderyds sjukhus · SELund University · SEÖrebro University · SESkåne University Hospital · SEUniversity Hospital of Umeå · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexual dysfunction is common following a cancer diagnosis in young adulthood (18-39 years) and problems related to sex life are ranked among the core concerns in this age group. Yet, few studies have investigated to what extent adults younger than 40, receive information from healthcare providers about the potential impact of cancer and its treatment on their sex life.

methodsA population-based cross-sectional survey study was conducted with 1010 young adults 1.5 years after being diagnosed with cancer (response rate 67%). Patients with breast, cervical, ovarian and testicular cancer, lymphoma, and brain tumors were identified in national quality registries. Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with receiving information were examined using multivariable binary logistic regression.

resultsMen to a higher extent than women reported having received information about potential cancer-related impact on their sex life (68% vs. 54%, p < 0.001). Receipt of information varied across diagnoses; in separate regression models, using lymphoma as reference, both women and men with brain tumors were less likely to receive information (women: OR 0.10, CI = 0.03-0.30; men: OR 0.37, CI = 0.16-0.85). More intensive treatment was associated with higher odds of receiving information in both women (OR 1.89; CI = 1.28-2.79) and men (OR 2.08; CI = 1.09-3.94). None of the sociodemographic factors were associated with receipt of information.

conclusionsTo improve sexual health communication to young adults with cancer, we recommend diagnosis-specific routines that clarify when in the disease trajectory to discuss these issues with patients and what to address in these conversations.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsSexual HealthTesticular NeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorYoung Adultcommunicationhealth personnelneoplasmssexual dysfunctionyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID36748659
PMCPMC10166940
OpenAlexW4319333000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.