ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023
Preferences of general practitioners for delivering adult vaccination: A discrete choice experiment.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Service delivery costs of vaccination at health facilities in Guangzhou, China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Herpes Zoster Vaccination Among Chinese Adults: Discrete Choice Experiment.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Primary care providers' preferences for pay-for-performance programs: a discrete choice experiment study in Shandong China.Human resources for health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preventive health workers rather than general practitioners (GPs) are the principal providers of vaccines in China, which may be a determinant of the unmet demand for vaccination, especially for adults, in recent years. GPs' preferences had a significant influence on alternative approaches to adult vaccination delivery. To better understand GP's preferences for adult vaccination services, we employed a discrete choice experiment with seven attributes: income, setting, information system, workshop, workload, performance measurement, and managerial support. Mixed logit models and latent class models were used for statistical analyses. In general, support from primary healthcare managers was the strongest driver of choice, followed by a 10% increase in workload, separate adult vaccination clinic, 5% increase in workload, and independent information system. Monthly income was significantly associated with provision of adult vaccination services. Based on the influence of latent factors, GPs fell into three classes that were correlated with GPs' years of practice, workload, income satisfaction, and knowledge-attitude-practicescore. Classes 1 and 2 valued the service setting and performance measurement differently, while Class 3 valued the service setting only (preferred separate adult vaccination clinics to provide service). This study generated actionable information to guide innovation in the adult vaccination delivery system in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.