Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36748247›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Accuracy of continuous photoplethysmography-based 1 min mean heart rate assessment during atrial fibrillation.

Astrid N L Hermans, Jonas L Isaksen, Monika Gawalko, Nikki A H A Pluymaekers, Rachel M J van der Velden, Hilco Snippe, Stijn Evens, Glenn De Witte, Justin G L M Luermans, Martin Manninger and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improving atrial fibrillation or flutter detection and management by smartphone-based photoplethysmography rhythm monitoring following cardiac surgery: a pragmatic randomized trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Monitoring of ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation patients through an app based on pulse-plethysmography.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Evaluating artificial intelligence-enabled medical tests in cardiology: Best practice.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. External validation of a machine learning-based classification algorithm for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics in pericardioversion atrial fibrillation patients using smartphone photoplethysmography: the SMARTBEATS-ALGO study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Characterization of atrial fibrillation burden using wearables].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Review
  16. Longer and better lives for patients with atrial fibrillation: the 9th AFNET/EHRA consensus conference.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Real-world validation of smartphone-based photoplethysmography for rate and rhythm monitoring in atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Astrid N L HermansDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9034-1479
Jonas L IsaksenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Nørregade 10, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3227-1131
Monika GawalkoDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4619-9062
Nikki A H A PluymaekersDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9663-6315
Rachel M J van der VeldenDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-3333
Hilco SnippeDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Stijn EvensQompium NV, Kempische Steenweg 293/16, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.
Glenn De WitteQompium NV, Kempische Steenweg 293/16, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.
Justin G L M LuermansDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9598-2286
Martin ManningerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerpl. 2, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0545-4373
Joost LumensDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8129-7384
Jørgen K KantersDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Nørregade 10, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-4910
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-0824
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DKMaastricht University · NLMedical University of Graz · ATMedical University of Warsaw · PLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAlthough mobile health tools using photoplethysmography (PPG) technology have been validated for the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), their utility for heart rate assessment during AF remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of continuous PPG-based 1 min mean heart rate assessment during AF. METHODS AND

resultsPersistent AF patients were provided with Holter electrocardiography (ECG) (for ≥24 h) simultaneously with a PPG-equipped smartwatch. Both the PPG-based smartwatch and Holter ECG automatically and continuously monitored patients' heart rate/rhythm. ECG and PPG recordings were synchronized and divided into 1 min segments, from which a PPG-based and an ECG-based average heart rate estimation were extracted. In total, 47 661 simultaneous ECG and PPG 1 min heart rate segments were analysed in 50 patients (34% women, age 73 ± 8 years). The agreement between ECG-determined and PPG-determined 1 min mean heart rate was high [root mean squared error (RMSE): 4.7 bpm]. The 1 min mean heart rate estimated using PPG was accurate within ±10% in 93.7% of the corresponding ECG-derived 1 min mean heart rate segments. PPG-based 1 min mean heart rate estimation was more often accurate during night-time (97%) than day-time (91%, P < 0.001) and during low levels (96%) compared to high levels of motion (92%, P < 0.001). A neural network with a 10 min history of the recording did not further improve the PPG-based 1 min mean heart rate assessment [RMSE: 4.4 (95% confidence interval: 3.5-5.2 bpm)]. Only chronic heart failure was associated with a lower agreement between ECG-derived and PPG-derived 1 min mean heart rates (P = 0.040).

conclusionDuring persistent AF, continuous PPG-based 1 min mean heart rate assessment is feasible in 60% of the analysed period and shows high accuracy compared with Holter ECG for heart rates <110 bpm.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsElectrocardiographyElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryFemaleHeart RateHumansMalePhotoplethysmography1 min mean heart rate assessmentElectrocardiographyMobile healthPersistent atrial fibrillationPhotoplethysmography

Identifiers

PMID36748247
PMCPMC10062358
OpenAlexW4319322865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.