Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36748049›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Botulinum Toxin Injection versus Extraocular Muscle Surgery for Acute Acquired Comitant Esotropia.

Sirinya Suwannaraj, Chawisa Rojanasaksothron, Yanasiri Methapisittikul, Phanthipha Wongwai, Yosanan Yospaiboon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluation of surgical outcomes and intervention threshold for small-angle acute acquired comitant esotropia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  4. Risk factors and predictors for botulinum toxin type A reinjection within six months in patients with acute acquired concomitant esotropia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sirinya SuwannarajKKU Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chawisa RojanasaksothronKKU Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Yanasiri MethapisittikulKKU Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Phanthipha WongwaiKKU Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Yosanan YospaiboonKKU Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0081-0102
Khon Kaen University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the success rate of extraocular muscle surgery and botulinum toxin injection for treatment in patients with acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE). Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study in which we treated 34 patients of AACE with botulinum toxin compared with 80 patients who had been treated with surgery. The data included angle of deviation in prism diopter (PD) at baseline and one, three, and six months after treatment. The main outcome was the success rate in each treatment group. Results: In the surgery group, mean esodeviation angles at baseline and one, three, and six months after treatment were 50.8 ± 18.3 PD, 4.9 ± 8.3 PD, 4.6 ± 9.5 PD, and 5.5 ± 10.3 PD, whereas those in the botulinum toxin group were 51.2 ± 14.3 PD, 13.9 ± 17.4 PD, 22.0 ± 19.3, and 31.3 ± 23.8 PD, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the deviation angles between the two groups ( Conclusion: Botulinum toxin injection was not as effective as conventional extraocular muscle surgery in AACE patients. However, the treatment is safe, fast-acting, and improves both cosmetic appearance and quality of life. This may be considered as a chance for patients not preferring surgery.

Indexed as

acute acquired comitant esotropiabotulinum toxinmuscle surgery

Identifiers

PMID36748049
PMCPMC9899017
OpenAlexW4318570269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.