Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36748030›Full record

ArticleGlobal journal of flexible systems management2021

Considerations Regarding Donation and Value Co-Creation in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Renata Klafke, Claudia T Picinin, Diego G Chevarria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global journal of flexible systems management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modeling a COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign in the State of Madhya Pradesh, India.Global journal of flexible systems management · 2023
    Article
  2. Prescriptive Analytics-Based SIRM Model for Predicting Covid-19 Outbreak.Global journal of flexible systems management · 2023
    Article
  3. Economic Efficiency of Outsourcing Business Models: A Comparative Assessment.Global journal of flexible systems management · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Renata KlafkeInstituto Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (IFRS), Av. São Vicente - Cinquentenário, Farroupilha, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-988X
Claudia T PicininUniversidade Tecnológica Federal Do Paraná (UTFPR), R. Doutor Washington Subtil Chueire 330 - Jardim Carvalho, Ponta Grossa, Parana Brazil.
Diego G ChevarriaInstituto Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul (IFRS), Av. São Vicente - Cinquentenário, Farroupilha, Rio Grande do Sul Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the phenomenon of strategic donation (including fundraising and intention to donate) through the lens of value co-creation before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 in non-profit organizations (NPOs). The methodology was based on interviews and statistical analyses of online data. The qualitative results demonstrated that within NPOs, neither the marketing strategy nor the fundraising has been greatly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. NPOs employ a variety of strategies, including value co-creation activities (events), which is a key element in influencing engagement and donation. The quantitative findings showed that "dialogue" is the most frequent of the value co-creation elements (dialogue, access, risk sharing, and transparency-DART) in the media (posts) under consideration. In general, linear regression indicated that, after the beginning of the pandemic, these DART elements may predict online interaction and intention to donate. Shares and comments had a weak R

Indexed as

COVID-19DonationMarketing strategiesNon-profit organizations

Identifiers

PMID36748030
PMCPMC8363092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.