Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747925›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

CTC-5: A novel digital pathology approach to characterise circulating tumour cell biodiversity.

B Ffrench, E Kashdan, Y Huang, C D Spillane, S Cocchiglia, S Charmsaz, D Varešlija, C O'Brien, D Scholz, C Martin and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

B FfrenchDepartment of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute and Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women's & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
E KashdanSystems Biology Ireland, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Y HuangDepartment of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute and Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women's & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
C D SpillaneDepartment of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute and Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women's & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
S CocchigliaEndocrine Oncology Research Group, Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
S CharmsazEndocrine Oncology Research Group, Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
D VarešlijaEndocrine Oncology Research Group, Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
C O'BrienCancer Molecular Diagnostics, St. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
D ScholzConway Institute, University College Dublin, Ireland.
C MartinDepartment of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute and Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women's & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
M GallagherDepartment of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute and Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women's & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
D A BrooksDepartment of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute and Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women's & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
R D BrooksCancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
S SelemidisSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3083, Australia.
N GleesonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
F AbuSaadehDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
C O'RiainDepartment of Histopathology, Central Pathology Laboratory, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
W KamranDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
R FlavinDepartment of Histopathology, Central Pathology Laboratory, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
L YoungEndocrine Oncology Research Group, Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
S A O'TooleDepartment of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute and Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women's & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J J O'LearyDepartment of Histopathology, Trinity College Dublin, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute and Emer Casey Molecular Pathology Research Laboratory, Coombe Women's & Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic progression and tumor evolution complicates the clinical management of cancer patients. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) characterization is a growing discipline that aims to elucidate tumor metastasis and evolution processes. CTCs offer the clinical potential to monitor cancer patients for therapy response, disease relapse, and screen 'at risk' groups for the onset of malignancy. However, such clinical utility is currently limited to breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients. Further understanding of the basic CTC biology of other malignancies is required to progress them towards clinical utility. Unfortunately, such basic clinical research is often limited by restrictive characterization methods and high-cost barrier to entry for CTC isolation and imaging infrastructure. As experimental clinical results on applications of CTC are accumulating, it is becoming clear that a two-tier system of CTC isolation and characterization is required. The first tier is to facilitate basic research into CTC characterization. This basic research then informs a second tier specialised in clinical prognostic and diagnostic testing. This study presented in this manuscript describes the development and application of a low-cost, CTC isolation and characterization pipeline; CTC-5. This approach uses an established 'isolation by size' approach (ScreenCell Cyto) and combines histochemical morphology stains and multiparametric immunofluorescence on the same isolated CTCs. This enables capture and characterization of CTCs independent of biomarker-based pre-selection and accommodates both single CTCs and clusters of CTCs. Additionally, the developed open-source software is provided to facilitate the synchronization of microscopy data from multiple sources (https://github.com/CTC5/). This enables high parameter histochemical and immunofluorescent analysis of CTCs with existing microscopy infrastructure without investment in CTC specific imaging hardware. Our approach confirmed by the number of successful tests represents a potential major advance towards highly accessible low-cost technology aiming at the basic research tier of CTC isolation and characterization. The biomarker independent approach facilitates closing the gap between malignancies with poorly, and well-defined CTC phenotypes. As is currently the case for some of the most commonly occurring breast, prostate and colorectal cancers, such advances will ultimately benefit the patient, as early detection of relapse or onset of malignancy strongly correlates with their prognosis.

Indexed as

Computer-assisted diagnosisCTC BiodiversityCTC CharacterizationCTC, circulating tumor cellCTC ScreeningDiagnostic imagingHeterotypic CTCsISET, isolation by size of epithelial tumor cellsMerging microscopy datasets

Identifiers

PMID36747925
PMCPMC9898658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.