ArticleHeliyon2023
Biomechanical analysis of customized cage conforming to the endplate morphology in anterior cervical discectomy fusion: A finite element analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design of 3D-printed hydroxyapatite intervertebral fusion cages in a patient specific framework.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Biomechanical effect of cage size in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Predictive value of Hounsfield units and vertebral bone quality on cage subsidence in oblique lateral interbody fusion with bilateral posterior fixation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed and 3D printed plate-locking interbody cage: an observational study of finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Overloaded Vertebral Body Following Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery Comparing with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Early radiographic outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anatomic versus lordotic cages.North American Spine Society journal · 2024Article
- Overloaded vertebral body: a unique radiographic phenomenon following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Biomechanical evaluation of a novel individualized zero-profile cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Sagittal sequence and clinical efficacy of cervical disc replacement and hybrid surgery in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), an interbody fusion device is an essential implant. An unsuitable interbody fusion device can cause postoperative complications, including subsidence and nonunion. We designed a customized intervertebral fusion device to reduce postoperative complications and validated it by finite element analysis. Herein, we built a non-homogeneous model of the C3-7 cervical spine. Three implant models (customized cage, commercial cage, and bone graft cage) were constructed and placed in the C45 cervical segment after ACDF surgery. The simulated range of motion (ROM), stress at the cage-bone interface, and stress on the cage and implants were compared under different conditions. The commercial cage showed maximum stress peaks at 40.3 MPa and 43.2 MPa in the inferior endplate of C4 and superior endplate of C5 under rotational conditions, higher compared to 29.7 MPa and 26.4 MPa, respectively, in the customized cage. The ROM was not significantly different between the three cages placed after ACDF. The stresses on the commercial cage were higher compared to the other two cages under all conditions. The bone graft in the customized cage was subject to higher stress than the commercial cage under all conditions, particularly lateral bending, wherein the maximum stress was 5.5 MPa. These results showed that a customized cage that better conformed to the vertebral anatomy was promising for reducing the risk of stress shielding and the occurrence of subsidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.