Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747923›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Biomechanical analysis of customized cage conforming to the endplate morphology in anterior cervical discectomy fusion: A finite element analysis.

Bin Sun, Qing Han, FengXu Sui, AoBo Zhang, Yang Liu, Peng Xia, JinCheng Wang, XiaoYu Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bin SunDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Qing HanDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
FengXu SuiDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
AoBo ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Peng XiaDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
JinCheng WangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
XiaoYu YangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), an interbody fusion device is an essential implant. An unsuitable interbody fusion device can cause postoperative complications, including subsidence and nonunion. We designed a customized intervertebral fusion device to reduce postoperative complications and validated it by finite element analysis. Herein, we built a non-homogeneous model of the C3-7 cervical spine. Three implant models (customized cage, commercial cage, and bone graft cage) were constructed and placed in the C45 cervical segment after ACDF surgery. The simulated range of motion (ROM), stress at the cage-bone interface, and stress on the cage and implants were compared under different conditions. The commercial cage showed maximum stress peaks at 40.3 MPa and 43.2 MPa in the inferior endplate of C4 and superior endplate of C5 under rotational conditions, higher compared to 29.7 MPa and 26.4 MPa, respectively, in the customized cage. The ROM was not significantly different between the three cages placed after ACDF. The stresses on the commercial cage were higher compared to the other two cages under all conditions. The bone graft in the customized cage was subject to higher stress than the commercial cage under all conditions, particularly lateral bending, wherein the maximum stress was 5.5 MPa. These results showed that a customized cage that better conformed to the vertebral anatomy was promising for reducing the risk of stress shielding and the occurrence of subsidence.

Indexed as

ACDFBiomechanicalCageCervicalFinite element analysis

Identifiers

PMID36747923
PMCPMC9898605
OpenAlexW4315628698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.