Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747916›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2023

One is the loneliest number: Involuntary celibacy (incel), mental health, and loneliness.

Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M Zidenberg, Mark E Olver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aspects of Quality of Life: Single vs. Mated People.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brandon SparksKingston University, 55-59 Penrhyn Rd., Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 2EE UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8945-5241
Alexandra M ZidenbergKing's University College at Western University, London, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1094-346X
Mark E OlverUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-0034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incels-a ragtag collection of young males who have rallied around their shared experience of romantic rejection-have slowly emerged as an online group of interest to researchers, no doubt as a result of several high-profile attacks. Much of this work has centered around incels' dating experiences, sexual attitudes, and online forums. However, it is possible that their moniker, short for involuntary celibate, has resulted in an overemphasis on their sexual exclusion and frustration. Recent work has identified social isolation as a key aspect of inceldom, which may help explain why incels have responded negatively to romantic rejection. The present study thus sought to examine the role of social support and loneliness in experiences of rejection in a sample of incel ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z.

Indexed as

DatingIncelInvoluntary celibacyLonelinessMisogynyViolence against women

Identifiers

PMID36747916
PMCPMC9892684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.