Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36747895›Full record

ArticleMultimedia tools and applications2023

Explaining sentiment analysis results on social media texts through visualization.

Rachna Jain, Ashish Kumar, Anand Nayyar, Kritika Dewan, Rishika Garg, Shatakshi Raman, Sahil Ganguly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multimedia tools and applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachna JainBhagwan Parshuram Institute of Technology, New Delhi, 110089 India.
Ashish KumarBharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi, 110063 India.
Anand NayyarGraduate School, Faculty of Information Technology, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, 550000 Viet Nam.
Kritika DewanBharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi, 110063 India.
Rishika GargBharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi, 110063 India.
Shatakshi RamanBharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi, 110063 India.
Sahil GangulyBharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, New Delhi, 110063 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, Artificial Intelligence is achieving prodigious real-time performance, thanks to growing computational data and power capacities. However, there is little knowledge about what system results convey; thus, they are at risk of being susceptible to bias, and with the roots of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") in almost every territory, even a minuscule bias can result in excessive damage. Efforts towards making AI interpretable have been made to address fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns. This paper proposes two unique methods to understand the system's decisions aided by visualizing the results. For this study, interpretability has been implemented on Natural Language Processing-based sentiment analysis using data from various social media sites like Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit. With Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning ("VADER"), heatmaps are generated, which account for visual justification of the result, increasing comprehensibility. Furthermore, Locally Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations ("LIME") have been used to provide in-depth insight into the predictions. It has been found experimentally that the proposed system can surpass several contemporary systems designed to attempt interpretability.

Indexed as

ExplainabilityInterpretabilityLIMEVADERVisualization

Identifiers

PMID36747895
PMCPMC9892668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.